Instructional Dissent as a Function of Student Conflict Styles

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine how students’ conflict styles (i.e., integrating, avoiding, dominating, obliging, and compromising) were related to the expression of instructional dissent (i.e., expressive, rhetorical, and vengeful). Participants were 160 undergraduate students, who completed a questionnaire measuring their conflict-handling communication with an instructor and how frequently they engaged in instructional dissent throughout the semester. Results of a canonical correlation revealed that (a) when students used the integrating, dominating, and compromising conflict styles, but did not use the avoiding style, they communicated more rhetorical dissent, and (b) when students used the dominating style, but not the integrating or obliging styles, they communicated more expressive, rhetorical, and vengeful dissent.

Keywords:

• Conflict Styles
• Instructional Dissent
• Student Dissent

Notes

Note. Wilks's Λ = .68; F(15, 414.49) = 4.21, p < .001.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Alan K. Goodboy

Alan K. Goodboy (Ph.D., West Virginia University, 2007) is an associate professor in the Department of Communication Studies at West Virginia University.

San Bolkan

San Bolkan (Ph.D., University of Texas–Austin, 2007) is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Studies at California State University, Long Beach.