The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) provides ratings for the majority of commercially released films. The MPAA system is based largely on estimates of what types of film content may be offensive to most parents. We identify four assumptions that underlie the current rating system and show how these assumptions are inconsistent with social science research regarding the impact of media portrayals on young viewers. Finally, we offer an alternative scheme based on what is harmful to children rather than what is offensive to parents.
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
Volume 34, 1990 - Issue 4
![Sample our Humanities journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5939/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Humanities.jpg"})
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Contemplating Ratings: An Examination of What the MPAA Considers “Too Far for R” and Why
Source:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Overrating the X‐Rating: The Third‐Person Perception and Support for Censorship of Pornography
Source:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Peers, Predators, and Porn: Predicting Parental Underestimation of Children's Risky Online Experiences
Source:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Violence is in the Eye of the Beholder
Source:
SAGE Publications
Linking provided by
