Positioning strategies and rankings in the HE: congruence and contradictions

ABSTRACT

Positioning strategy and ranking are critical issues in an increasingly competitive higher education landscape. Unless there is conceptual congruence between positioning strategies and rankings, the signals may become diffused and confusing for prospective students. This paper seeks the congruence between positioning strategies and ranking. Since without a validated typology of positioning strategies, such congruence cannot be sought, this paper firstly aims to develop an empirically derived typology of positioning strategies for HEIs. The population consists of HEIs in the UK. Content analysis was used to analyze the WebPages of HEIs to identify positioning bases, and congruence and contradictions between those positioning bases and ranking were identified by correspondence analysis. As a result, a new positioning typology consisting of eight bases, which are top of the range, campus life experience, internationalization, teaching excellence, research quality, graduates prospects, location, and value for money, was identified. In conclusion, HEIs are categorized into three different groups as Leaders and Challengers, Followers, and Nichers and Cost Leaders, and recommendations about how to guarantee congruence between positioning strategy and ranking were made. HEIs should choose positioning bases in line with their rankings since congruence strengthens the position in the minds.

KEYWORDS:

• Brand positioning
• positioning strategy
• university branding
• ranking
• Signaling theory
• information asymmetry

Acknowledgement

The author expresses his gratitude to Prof. Stavros Kalafatis for his guidance throughout the study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 https://www.theguardian.com/education/ng-interactive/2017/may/16/university-league-tables-2018