Abstract
This article uses estimates of changes in frictional trading costs and the GTAP computable general equilibrium model to assess the effects of increased security concerns following the terrorist attacks of September 11 on international trade. As a result of additional security measures, trading companies have been confronted with additional costs relating to transport, handling, insurance, and customs. These costs tend to make international trade more expensive and reduce trade flows. The results from scenario analyses show that regions with high trade to GDP ratios and sectors with elastic import demand suffer the largest trade and welfare losses in relative terms.
Peter Walkenhorst and N. Dihel are economists in the Trade Directorate, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
The views expressed in the paper are not necessary those of the OECD or its member countries.
Notes
Peter Walkenhorst and N. Dihel are economists in the Trade Directorate, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
The views expressed in the paper are not necessary those of the OECD or its member countries.
Babione, R., Kim, C.K., Rhone, E., and Sanjaya, E. 2003. Post 9/11 Security Cost Impact on Port of Seattle Import/Export Container Traffic, Working Paper. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
PECC (Pacific Economic Cooperation Council). 2004. Study on the Mutually Supportive Advancement of APEC’s Trade Facilitation and Secure Trade Goals Post September 11. PECC. Singapore: Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, Singapore
Poirson, H. 1998. Economic Security, Private Investment, and Growth in Developing Countries, IMF Working Paper WP/98/04. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund