5,386
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What makes a good teacher? Comparing the perspectives of students on the autism spectrum and staff

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 610-624 | Received 08 Apr 2020, Accepted 10 Jun 2020, Published online: 29 Jun 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Involving students on the autism spectrum in decision-making about their education is good practice for inclusion and mandated by the Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice in England. This article reports on two linked studies investigating the perspectives of 12 secondary mainstream students on the autism spectrum aged 11–15 years, and their teachers (n = 10), about teaching and support. Students and teachers agreed that staff members were more likely to focus on the needs of the class rather than the needs of the individual student, which could be very difficult to navigate successfully. In addition, students emphasised the importance of feeling understood and supported in school. However, differences in sensory perceptions and communication meant that students sometimes felt misunderstood by staff, leading to feelings of hurt and frustration. This suggests it is important to understand the needs of individual students on the autism spectrum, and adapt teaching and pastoral strategies accordingly, in order to promote an appropriately inclusive educational environment.

Acknowledgments

With many thanks to the students and staff who participated in the studies, and for both schools and additional staff who enabled this to happen. Thanks also to Professor Kyriaki Messiou for her support and guidance throughout this research.

Disclosure statement

All authors declare no conflict of interests.

Notes

1. The phrase ‘on the autism spectrum’ is used throughout this paper to reflect the view that ‘ … beyond the autism diagnosis – and its negative as well as positive associations – there is a unique person whose human rights should be respected.’ (Vivanti Citation2020, 692)

2. The students selected their own pseudonyms and their responses have been reported using gender neutral pronouns to limit the chances of identification. The staff members expressed no preference, and therefore their pseudonyms were chosen at random.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 456.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.