3
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Learning Amid Controversy: Prostate Cancer Knowledge and Screening Practices Among US Medical Students

, , , &
Pages 108-113 | Published online: 02 Jun 2008
 

Abstract

Background. No studies have examined medical students' recommendation and use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and digital rectal exam (DRE) to screen for prostate cancer. We hypothesized that students' race and extent of training on these techniques would be associated with their administration of them. Methods. We analyzed multiinstitutional longitudinal data from a cohort of 2181 medical students in the class of 2003. We queried students' health behavior, their knowledge of prostate cancer racial disparities, their frequency of performing a PSA test or a DRE on a man 50 years of age or older (senior year only), the perceived relevance of such services to their future practice, and their training on PSA and DRE. We examined predictors of students' administering PSA and DRE tests to patients during the senior year and changes in the predictors over time. Results. Respectively, 27% and 34% of students reported using the PSA and DRE “usually/always” during their senior year. Black students reported administering the PSA test more often than did students of other races, but race was not a significant predictor of PSA screening after controlling for personal healthy behavior. High perceived relevance to future practice and extensive training on PSA were most strongly associated with administration of PSA. Conclusions. The association between healthy personal behavior and PSA administration confounded the association between race and PSA screening. These results may help explain differences in prostate cancer screening among physicians and help medical educators tailor their curricula on prostate cancer screening. J Cancer Educ. 2008; 23:108–113.

Acknowledgments

This research was performed under an appointment to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Research Participation Program, administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education under contract number DE-AC05-00OR22750 between the US Department of Energy and Oak Ridge Associated Universities. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Notes

11. Bieler GS, and Williams RL. Analyzing repeated measures and cluster-correlated data using SUDAAN release 7.5. Research Triangle Insitute, pp. 1–13, 33. Published 8-1-1997. Last accessed 3–27–0006.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.