Publication Cover
CRANIO®
The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice
Volume 34, 2016 - Issue 4
2,898
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Guest Editorial

Comprehensive dental diagnosis and treatment planning for occlusal rehabilitation: a perspective

, &

The indications for administering invasive dental treatments to patients with temporomandibular disorders have been controversial since the second half of the last century.Citation1,2 The need to implement reproducible dynamic measurement devices and clinical and instrumental functional analysis throughout dental diagnosis and treatment is equally mandatory.Citation3 Patients are increasingly aware of high-quality dentistry and demand better longevity from their dental therapies. Due to the increase in functional occlusion-related diseases in the last few decadesCitation4 and rapid improvements in dental materials and technology that have created new options, the dental community needs to take a fresh look at the appropriate diagnostic and planning techniques that should be used prior to administering invasive dental treatment. This will ensure the delivery of the optimal therapeutic benefits to patients.

The temporomandibular joints (TMJs) and their spatial position within the glenoid fossae are the key parameters for undisturbed function, not only of the masticatory system but also as a receptor and mediator of body posture.Citation5–10

Craniomandibular system, neuromuscular system, and occlusal guidance system

The functional joint space of the TMJ is relatively narrow. Any deviation and/or deflection of 0.6–0.8 mm in any direction (cranially, dorsally, or transversally) produces a loading situation for the components of the joints (bilaminar zone, articular disc, ligaments, and bony structures).Citation11–15 This leads to a neuromuscular avoidance reaction, i.e. compensation within the masticatory systemCitation16 and the buffer regions of the neighboring organ systems (head position, shoulder girdle, vertebral spine, etc.).Citation17,18

The physiological position of the TMJs is secured and dominated by static and dynamic occlusion. This prevents muscle hyperactivity by evenly distributing the forces of the masticatory and associated muscles.Citation19–21 The occlusal scheme, which includes the spatial position of the occlusal plane, plays a very important role in these tasks.Citation22 It is evident that a sequentially guided occlusion with canine dominance leads to posterior dis-occlusion, the avoidance of protrusive, laterotrusive, and mediotrusive posterior dental interferences and seems to be best suited for providing undisturbed function of the neuro-muscular system.Citation23–26 Deviations from this occlusal scheme, in terms of the so-called malocclusions or occlusally dominated malfunctions, can easily lead to the development of painful symptoms in the form of a temporomandibular disorder.Citation27,28

Furthermore, it has been definitively proven that occlusal malfunction causes deflective TMJ positioning,Citation29–32 which can lead to the development of tissue damage, such as the loosening of the ligamentous apparatus,Citation33 inflammation of the capsular components, displacement of the condyle and articular cartilage,Citation34 or, in the worst case, resorption of the bony structures of the TMJs.Citation35 These kinds of tissue injuries can lead to symptoms such as muscle hyperactivity, neck pain, headaches, and other neurological symptoms such as muscle or joint pain and/or decreased range of motion of the mandibular movements in a very high percentage of cases.Citation36–45

Occlusion seems to be a ‘fine-tuning’ neurologic feedback system that guides mandibular movements against maxillary dentition.Citation46–49 At the same time, occlusal contacts seem to be responsible for maintaining the condylar position within a physiological range.Citation12–16

Knowing that occlusal sensitivity is within the range of 0.02–0.03 mm,Citation48,50–55 that TMJ has a ‘deflection’ tolerance of only 0.6–0.8 mm,Citation12–15,49 and that the angular difference between the steepness of the articular eminence and the contra-lateral canine guidance of any skeletal class is ≤10°,Citation53–55 it becomes clear that dentistry is dealing with a highly individual and highly complex organ system.Citation3,56–58

Diagnostic approach

In order to obtain an optimal diagnosis and treatment plan, as well as devise a custom-tailored treatment approach for any individual patient, as much information as possible must be collected about each individual using a maximum standardized approach.Citation3,49,59,60 These records should not only include thorough anamnesis and a clinical functional analysis that includes accurately mounted casts and articulator occlusal analysis, but also precise and reproducible kinematic measurements/tracings of the 3-dimensional condylar paths.Citation3,49,61 This allows the clinician to determine the real-time motions of the mandible and synchronize these records with the static and dynamic occlusion on the articulator, which then becomes a simulator of the patient’s mandibular motion.Citation60

If necessary, additional analyses, including imaging techniques and additional medical consultations, are needed to confirm the differential diagnosis. In this way, the differential diagnosis can prove occlusion as a causative etiological factor for the development of the signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders.Citation62,63

Therapeutic approach

Administering a reversible initial therapy to an occlusion is a must when pretreating patients with a potentially occlusion-dictated temporomandibular disorder.Citation45, 64–68 The symptoms should positively and significantly decrease before considering invasive treatments (e.g. selective functional equilibration, orthodontic treatment, rehabilitation of occlusal surfaces (onlays, inlays, partial crowns), and/or prosthodontic reconstruction) .

In the case of a positive outcome following reversible pretreatment, i.e. after objectively (by a decrease of the clinical signs) and subjectively (by the patient) reevaluating the patient’s condition in a standardized way, definitive occlusal treatment is the next logical step following the initial therapy.Citation45,46,59,65,66 After confirming the diagnosis, occlusal rehabilitation must be executed after strictly considering the physiological condylar position and the exact application of occlusal sequential guidance with canine dominance.Citation3,4,49,53–55

Using precise, objective, and reproducible diagnostic and measurement techniques, and applying a standardized treatment protocol for occlusal rehabilitation, it is possible to obtain highly predictable therapeutic results.Citation44,59,61 In addition, it is also feasible to monitor the progress of the reconstructive and orthodontic dental treatment, as well as to adapt ongoing treatments at any time if changes that occur require further diagnosis and correction.Citation67,68

References

  • Scrivani SJ, Keith DA, Kaban LB. Temporomandibular disorders. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(25):2693–705.10.1056/NEJMra0802472
  • Greene CS. Etiology of temporomandibular disorders. Semin Orthod. 1995;1(4):222–8.10.1016/S1073-8746(95)80053-0
  • Slavicek R. The masticatory organ. Gamma Medical-Scientific Education, Inc. 2002.
  • Greven M. TMD, bruxism and occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(4):424.10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.02.007
  • Cuccia A, Caradonna C. The relationship between the stomatognathic system and body posture. Clinics. 2009;64(1):61–6.
  • Costen JB. A syndrome of ear and sinus symptoms dependent upon disturbed function of the temporomandibular joint. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1997;106(10):805–19.10.1177/000348949710601002
  • Costen JB. Neuralgias and ear symptoms associated with disturbed function of the temporomandibular joint. JAMA. 1936;107:252.10.1001/jama.1936.02770300006002
  • Fimiani A. Adult scoliosis. In: 10th Congress SIRER Lyon. The Vertebral Spine-European Resonances (French). 41, 2005. pp. 1707–08.
  • Bricot B. Total postural reprogramming. 3rd ed. Statipro. 2011.
  • Ludwig O, Schmitt E. Neurocybernetics of body posture. Posture and Mobility (German). 2006;26:5–14.
  • Sato S, Slavicek R. The masticatory organ and stress management. Inter J Stoma Occl Med. 2009;1(1):51–7.
  • Christiansen G. Computer-aided measurement of the functional joint space of the temporomandibular joint. J Craniomand Func. 2014;2(4):329–43.
  • Otsuka T, Watanabe K, Hirano Y, Kubo K, Miyake S, Sato S, et al. Effects of mandibular deviation on brain activation during clenching: an fMRI preliminary study. Cranio. 2009;27(2):88–93.10.1179/crn.2009.014
  • Otsuka T, Sasaguri K, Watanabe K, Hirano Y, Niwa M, Kubo K, et al. Influence of the TMJ position on limbic system activation – an fMRI study. J Craniomand Func. 2011;3(1):29–39.
  • Greven M, Otsuka T, Zutz L, Weber B, Elger C, Sato S. The amount of TMJ displacement correlates with brain activity. Cranio. 2011;29(4):291–6.10.1179/crn.2011.043
  • Tamaki K, Hori N, Fujiwara M, Yoshino T, Toyoda M, Sato S. A pilot study on masticatory muscle activities during grinding movements in occlusion with different guiding areas on working side. Bull Kanagawa Dental Coll. 2001;29:26–27.
  • Pittschieler E, Wolz S, von Rolbeck H, Medlitsch A. Maxillo-mandibular relationship. Information from orthodontic and craniofacial orthopedics (German). 2012;44(4):260–75.
  • Plato G, Kopp S. The jaw and chronic pain syndromes. Manual Medicine (German). 1999;37:143–151.10.1007/s003370050121
  • Sugimoto K, Yoshimi H, Sasaguri K, Sato S. Occlusion factors influencing the magnitude of sleep bruxism activity. Cranio. 2011;29(2):127–37.10.1179/crn.2011.021
  • Park BK, Tokiwa O, Takezawa Y, Takahashi Y, Sasaguri K, Sato S. Relationship of tooth grinding pattern during sleep bruxism and temporomandibular joint status. Cranio. 2008;26(1):8–15.10.1179/crn.2008.003
  • Tokiwa O, Park BK, Takezawa Y, Takahashi Y, Sasaguri K, Sato S. Relationship of tooth grinding pattern during sleep bruxism and dental status. Cranio. 2008;26(4):287–93.10.1179/crn.2008.039
  • Fushima K, Kitamura Y, Mita H, Sato S, Suzuki Y, Kim YH. Significance of the cant of the posterior occlusal plane in Class II division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18(1):27–40.10.1093/ejo/18.1.27
  • Carlsson GE. Some dogmas related to prosthodontics, temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. Acta Odont Scand. 2010;68(6):313–22.10.3109/00016357.2010.517412
  • Akören AC, Karaačaçliočlu L. Comparison of the electromyographic activity of individuals with canine guidance and group function occlusion. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22(1):73–7.10.1111/jor.1995.22.issue-1
  • Yoshiaka A, Shoji K, Raul M. Influence of changing the location of anterior guidance teeth on the movements of the condyles during unilateral clenching. Dent Jpn. 1999;35:48–52.
  • Okano N, Baba K, Akishige S, Ohyama T. The influence of altered occlusal guidance on condylar displacement. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29(11):1091–8.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00937.x
  • Santos J, Blackman RB, Nelson SJ. Vectorial analysis of the static equilibrium of forces generated in the mandible in centric occlusion, group function, and balanced occlusion relationships. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65(4):557–67.10.1016/0022-3913(91)90300-L
  • Kahn J, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Moss ME, Murphy WC. Association between dental occlusal variables and intraarticular temporomandibular joint disorders: Horizontal and vertical overlap. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79(6):658–62.10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70072-1
  • Rodrigues AF, Fraga MR, Vitral RWF. Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in Class II Division 1 and Class III malocclusion patients: Condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;136:199–206.10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.033
  • Weinberg LA. The etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of TMJ dysfunction-pain syndrome. Part I: Etiology. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;42(6):654–64.
  • Weinberg LA, Lager LA. Clinical report on the etiology and diagnosis of TMJ dysfunction-pain syndrome. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;44(6):642–53.10.1016/0022-3913(80)90462-X
  • Weinberg LA. The role of stress, occlusion, and condyle position in TMJ dysfunction-pain. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49(4):532–45.10.1016/0022-3913(83)90318-9
  • Celić R, Jerolimov V, Pandurić J. A study of the influence of occlusal factors and parafunctional habits on the prevalence of signs and symptoms of TMD. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15(1):43–8.
  • Crawford SD. Condylar axis position as determined by the occlusion and measured by the CPI instrument, and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction. Angle Orthod. 1999;69(2):103–14.
  • Bonilla-Aragon H, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Kyrkanides S, Moss ME. Condyle position as a predictor of temporomandibular joint internal derangement. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82(2):205–8.10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70157-5
  • Randow K, Carlsson K, Edlund J, Oberg T. The effect of an occlusal interference on the masticatory system. An experimental investigation. Odontol Rev. 1976;27(4):245–56.
  • Areso MP, Giralt MT, Sainz B, Prieto M, Garcia-Vallejo P, Gomez FM. Occlusal disharmonies modulate central catecholaminergic activity in the rat. J Dent Res. 1999;78(6):1204–13.10.1177/00220345990780060301
  • Onozuka M, Fujita M, Watanabe K, Hirano Y, Niwa M, Nishiyama K, Saito S. Mapping brain region activity during chewing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Dent Res. 2002;81(11):743–6.10.1177/154405910208101104
  • Onozuka M, Fujita M, Watanabe K, Hirano Y, Niwa M, Nishiyama K, et al. Age-related changes in brain regional activity during chewing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Dent Res. 2003;82(8):657–60.10.1177/154405910308200817
  • Budtz-Jørgensen E. Occlusal dysfunction and stress. An experimental study in macaque monkeys. J Oral Rehabil. 1981;8(1):1–9.10.1111/jor.1981.8.issue-1
  • Kubo KY, Yamada Y, Iinuma M, Iwaku F, Tamura Y, Watanabe K, et al. Occlusal disharmony induces spatial memory impairment and hippocampal neuron degeneration via stress in SAMP8 mice. Neurosci Lett. 2007;414(2):188–91.10.1016/j.neulet.2006.12.020
  • Yoshihara T, Matsumoto Y, Ogura T. Occlusal disharmony affects plasma corticosterone and hypothalamic noradrenaline release in rats. J Dent Res. 2001;80(12):2089–92.10.1177/00220345010800121301
  • Kirveskari P, Le Bell Y, Salonen M, Forssell H, Grans L. Effect of elimination of occlusal interferences on signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorder in young adults. J Oral Rehab. 1989;16(1):21–6.10.1111/jor.1989.16.issue-1
  • Kirveskari P, Jamsä T. Health risk from occlusal interferences in females. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31(5):490–5.10.1093/ejo/cjp021
  • Le Bell Y. Are occlusal treatments still possible and appropriate methods in clinical dentistry? J Craniomand Func. 2014;6(4):317–32.
  • Jankelson R. Neuromuscular dental diagnosis and treatment. Ishiyaku Euroamerica. 1990.
  • McHorris WH. Focus on anterior guidance. J Gnatol. 1989;8:3–13.
  • Shimazaki T, Otsuka T, Akimoto S, Kubo KY, Sato S, Sasaguri K. Comparison of brain activation via tooth stimulation. J Dent Res. 2012;91(8):759–63.10.1177/0022034512450880
  • Slavicek R. Functional determinants of the masticatory system. Dentistry (German). 1985; 29(10):663–4.
  • Levy JH. Teeth as Sensory Organs. VISTAS – Dawson. 2009; 2(3).
  • Levy JH, Robertson N, Lilly DJ, Petrisor D, Dong WK. Possible role of intradental afferents in the mechanoception of tooth contacts in humans. J Dent Res. 2002;81(A):3199.
  • Levy JH, Lilly DJ, Dong WK. Low-frequency vibration thresholds of human maxillary central incisors. Dent Res. 2003;82 (spec iss A):1110.
  • Robertson LT, Levy JH, Petrisor D, Lilly DJ, Dong WK. Vibration perception thresholds of human maxillary and mandibular central incisors. Arch Oral Biol. 2003;48(4):309–16.10.1016/S0003-9969(03)00006-2
  • Petrisor D, Levy JH, Robertson LT. Tactile thresholds of human maxillary and mandibular incisors. J Dent Res. 2002;81(spec iss A):3200.
  • Enkling N, Nicolay C, Bayer S, Mericske-Stern R, Utz KH. Investigating interocclusal perception in tactile teeth sensibility using symmetric and asymmetric analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14(6):683–90.10.1007/s00784-009-0348-3
  • Takei J, Akimoto S, Sato S. Occlusal guidance and occlusal planes at different ages and different occlusion groups follow the sequential occlusion concept. Bull Kanagawa Dent Coll. 2009;29:26–27.
  • Fukoe H, Basili C, Slavicek R, Sato S, Akimoto S. Three-dimensional analyses of the mandible and the occlusal architecture of mandibular dentition. J Stomat Occ Med. 2012;5(3):119–29.10.1007/s12548-012-0053-8
  • Costa HN, Slavicek R, Sato S. A computerized tomography study of the morphological interrelationship between the temporal bones and the craniofacial complex. J Anat. 2012;220(6):544–54.10.1111/joa.2012.220.issue-6
  • Cooper BC. temporomandibular disorders: a position paper of the international college of cranio-mandibular orthopedics (ICCMO). Cranio. 2011;29(3):237–44.10.1179/crn.2011.034
  • Ahlers MO, Bernhardt O, Jakstat HA, Kordaß B, Türp JC, Schindler HJ, et al. Motion analysis of the mandible: guidelines for standardized analysis of computer-assisted recording of condylar movements. Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(3):201–23.
  • Marpaung CM, Kalaykova SI, Lobbezoo F, Naeije M. Validity of functional diagnostic examination for temporomandibular joint disc displacement with reduction. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41(4):243–9.10.1111/joor.12130
  • Alanen P. Occlusion and temporomandibular disorders (TMD): still unsolved question? J Dent Res. 2002;81(8):518–9.10.1177/154405910208100803
  • Alanen P, Kirveskari P. Occlusion, evidence and causality – etiology of temporomandibular disorders. J Craniomand Func. 2012;4(1):9–19.
  • Kirveskari P, Alanen P. “Ideal” dental occlusion: a source of confusion in studies of functional disorders. J Craniomand Func. 2014;6(4):307–15.
  • Kirveskari P, Jamsa T, Alanen P. Occlusal adjustment and the incidence of demand for temporomandibular disorder treatment. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79(4):433–8.10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70158-1
  • Le Bell Y, Niemi PM, Jämsä T, Kylmälä M, Alanen P. Subjective reactions to intervention with artificial interferences in subjects with and without a history of temporomandibular disorders. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006;64(1):59–63.10.1080/00016350500419867
  • Cairns B, List T, Michelotti A, Ohrbach R, Svensson P. JOR-CORE recommendations on rehabilitation of temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(6):481–9.10.1111/jor.2010.37.issue-6
  • Schindler HJ, Hugger A, Kordab B, Türp J. Splint therapy for temporomandibular disorders: basic principles. J Craniomand Func. 2014;6(3):207–30.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.