Who Cares for Involuntary Clients?

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were to compare characteristics of outpatient substance abuse treatment (OSAT) units that serve high proportions of involuntary clients (ICs) with those that serve a low percentage of such clients. The authors analyze unit-level 1995–2005 data from the National Drug Abuse Treatment System Survey (NDATSS). Approximately 1/6 of OSAT units draw the dominant majority of their clients from involuntary referrals. OSAT units that treat a high proportion of ICs are less likely to be accredited by professional organizations, have fewer treatment staff with advanced degrees, and have shorter average treatment duration than do OSAT units that serve few ICs. OSAT units that serve ICs are more likely to offer legal and domestic violence services but are less likely to offer mental health services or aftercare. OSAT units that serve ICs are less likely to be hospital-affiliated than are other units. Clients at such facilities are more likely to be convicted of driving while intoxicated (DWI), are younger, are less likely to have received prior treatment, are more likely to remain abstinent after treatment, but are more likely to be remanded back to courts. The authors conclude that ICs are an important market niche in OSAT care. DWI is by far the most common offense reported in units that specialize in ICs. Aside from legal and domestic violence services, units with a high proportion of ICs appear to offer somewhat less intensive and professionalized services than do other facilities; however, clients at these units are more likely to be abstinent at the end of treatment and but more likely to be remanded back to the courts.

KEYWORDS:

• Court referral
• involuntary clients
• outpatient substance abuse treatment
• trends

Grant R01-DA32727 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and a seed grant from the Chicago Center of Excellence in Health Promotion Economics supported this research. The views expressed here are the authors' and not necessarily those of NIDA. The Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan approved this research

Notes

∗Significant at .05.

∗∗Significant at .01.

∗Significant at .05.

∗∗Significant at .01.

∗Significant at .05.

∗∗Significant at .01.