254
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Reports

Racial differences and the role of neighborhood in the sequencing of marijuana and tobacco initiation among urban youth

, PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD & , PhD
Pages 507-510 | Published online: 29 Sep 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Background: With patterns of initiation of tobacco and marijuana changing, there is increasing evidence that marijuana use may serve as an antecedent to tobacco use among adolescents. However, studies have not fully characterized the prevalence of these patterns among vulnerable youth and have rarely examined the factors that predict the sequencing of onset of tobacco and marijuana use. Methods: Utilizing longitudinal data from a sample of urban youth followed from age 6 to age 18, the authors identify the sequencing of initiation of tobacco and marijuana and test whether race and 5 neighborhood factors (i.e., perceived disorder, drug activity, drug access, exposure to violence, and exposure to violent victimization) predict onset sequencing. Results: Various sequencing patterns were observed, with 12.4% of the sample initiating marijuana use before tobacco use was initiated. In adjusted logistic regression models, black youth were 2.66 times as likely as whites to initiate marijuana before tobacco compared with initiating tobacco before marijuana (P = .032). Youth with greater exposure to violent victimization were 3.89 times as likely to initiate marijuana first than initiate tobacco first (P = .002). Other neighborhood factors were not statistically significantly associated with sequencing. Conclusions: Black youth and youth with greater exposure to victimization had an increased risk of initiating marijuana before tobacco, which suggests that this pattern may be rooted in specific risk factors. Substance use prevention efforts should consider taking into account that marijuana use may put certain youth at risk of initiating tobacco. Future research needs to monitor sequencing, as well as risk factors for and consequences of the various patterns, particularly since marijuana use and the mixing of tobacco and marijuana use are gaining acceptability in general populations.

Funding

This work was supported by R01DA032550, R37DA11796, and K01DA031738 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or the National Institutes of Health. The funding organization had no role in the following: design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Kerry M. Green

Author contributions

Drs. Green and Reboussin conceptualized the manuscript. Dr. Ialongo was responsible for initiating the original study and collecting all the data. Drs. Green, Johnson, and Milam contributed to the literature review. Dr. Green conducted the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the draft and approved the final version.

Renee M. Johnson

Author contributions

Drs. Green and Reboussin conceptualized the manuscript. Dr. Ialongo was responsible for initiating the original study and collecting all the data. Drs. Green, Johnson, and Milam contributed to the literature review. Dr. Green conducted the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the draft and approved the final version.

Adam J. Milam

Author contributions

Drs. Green and Reboussin conceptualized the manuscript. Dr. Ialongo was responsible for initiating the original study and collecting all the data. Drs. Green, Johnson, and Milam contributed to the literature review. Dr. Green conducted the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the draft and approved the final version.

Debra Furr-Holden

Author contributions

Drs. Green and Reboussin conceptualized the manuscript. Dr. Ialongo was responsible for initiating the original study and collecting all the data. Drs. Green, Johnson, and Milam contributed to the literature review. Dr. Green conducted the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the draft and approved the final version.

Nicholas S. Ialongo

Author contributions

Drs. Green and Reboussin conceptualized the manuscript. Dr. Ialongo was responsible for initiating the original study and collecting all the data. Drs. Green, Johnson, and Milam contributed to the literature review. Dr. Green conducted the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the draft and approved the final version.

Beth A. Reboussin

Author contributions

Drs. Green and Reboussin conceptualized the manuscript. Dr. Ialongo was responsible for initiating the original study and collecting all the data. Drs. Green, Johnson, and Milam contributed to the literature review. Dr. Green conducted the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the draft and approved the final version.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.