A meta-analysis was conducted on the legitimization of paltry favors (LPF) effect (Cialdini & Schroeder, Citation1976). A total of 19 studies met the inclusion criteria, with a combined sample of 2,730 subjects. Excluding studies in which the LPF request was delivered via mail and those studies that accepted pledges as the dependent variable resulted in a homogeneous set of effect sizes (r = .18, OR = 2.41). While the data provide clues as to possible mediating mechanisms, the cause of the effect is still not clear. Directions for future research are suggested.
1Presentation mode: FTF = face to face, M = mailed.
2Dependent variable: I = immediate, P = pledge.
3Sex of requestor: M = male, F = female, B = both male and female, I = impersonal request.
4Place request made: H = subject's home, P = public.
5Whether confederate was blind to condition.
6LPF Message: 1 = variant of “even a penny will help,” 2 = “contributions from a penny on up,” 3 = included pregiving, 4 = included dialogue induction, 5 = included normative information.
7Control message: 1 = simple direct request, 2 = included normative information, 3 = included pregiving, 4 = included dialogue induction.
Clearly, there are alternative methods of performing meta-analysis (e.g., Glass, McGaw, & Smith, Citation1981; Hedges & Olkin, Citation1985; Rosenthal, Citation1991). Hunter's variance-centered method has been used extensively and effectively in communication research (e.g., Allen et al., Citation2007; Boster & Mongeau, Citation1984; Dillard et al., Citation1984; Hullett, Citation2005). Moreover, it has been our observation that alternative methods rarely yield estimates that differ substantially when the methods are executed competently (e.g., Schmidt & Hunter, Citation1999). In any event, Tables and present the raw data that allow our conclusions to be examined with alternative methods.
Another dependent variable of interest is the difference in mean donation in the experimental and control groups. In some studies (e.g., DeJong & Oopik, Citation1992; Dolinski et al., Citation2005; Fraser & Hite, Citation1989), this value was reported for all experimental and control group subjects. In other studies (e.g., Fraser et al., Citation1988; Reeves & Saucer, Citation1993; Takada & Levine, Citation2007), this value was reported only for those who donated. This fact made the calculation of the within cell variances impossible, and thus, made the calculation of an effect size impossible for this dependent measure.
Glass
,
G. V.
,
McGaw
,
B.
, &
Smith
,
M. L.
(
1981
).
Meta-analysis and social research
. Beverly Hills , CA :
Sage
.
Allen
,
M.
,
Emmers-Sommer
,
T. M.
,
D'Alessio
,
D.
,
Timmerman
,
L.
,
Hanzal
,
A.
, &
Korus
,
J.
(
2007
).
The connection between the physiological and psychological reactions to sexually explicit materials: A literature summary using meta-analysis
.
Communication Monographs
,
74
,
541
–
560
.
Boster
,
F. J.
, &
Mongeau
,
P.
(
1984
).
Fear-arousing persuasive messages
. In
R. N.
Bostrom
&
B. H.
Westley
(Eds.),
Communication yearbook
(Vol.
8
, pp.
330
–
375
). Newbury Park , CA :
Sage
.
Dillard
,
J. P.
,
Hunter
,
J. E.
, &
Burgoon
,
M.
(
1984
).
Sequential-request persuasive strategies: Meta-analysis of foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face
.
Human Communication Research
,
10
,
461
–
488
.
Schmidt
,
F. L.
, &
Hunter
,
J. E.
(
1999
).
Comparison of three meta-analysis methods revisited: An analysis of Johnson, Mullen, and Salas (1995)
Journal of Applied Psychology
,
84
,
144
–
148
.
DeJong
,
W.
, &
Oopik
,
A. J.
(
1992
).
Effect of legitimizing small contributions and labeling potential donors as “helpers” on responses to a direct mail solicitation for charity
.
Psychological Reports
,
71
,
923
–
928
.
Dolinski
,
D.
,
Grzyb
,
T.
,
Olejnik
,
J.
,
Prusakowski
,
S.
, &
Urban
,
K.
(
2005
).
Let's dialogue about penny: Effectiveness of dialogue involvement and legitimizing paltry contribution techniques
.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
,
35
,
1150
–
1170
.
Fraser
,
C.
, &
Hite
,
R. E.
(
1989
).
The effect of matching contribution offers and legitimization of paltry contributions on compliance
.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
,
19
,
1010
–
1018
.
Fraser
,
C.
,
Hite
,
R. E.
, &
Sauer
,
P. L.
(
1988
).
Increasing contributions in solicitation campaigns: The use of large and small anchorpoints
.
The Journal of Consumer Research
,
15
,
284
–
287
.
Reeves
,
R. A.
, &
Saucer
,
P. R.
(
1993
).
A test of commitment in legitimizing paltry contributions
.
Journal of Social Behavior and Personality
,
8
,
537
–
544
.
Takada
,
J.
, &
Levine
,
T. R.
(
2007
).
The effects the even-a-few-minutes-would-help strategy, perspective taking, and empathic concern on the successful recruiting of volunteers on campus
.
Communication Research Reports
,
24
,
177
–
184
.