Abstract
Via a communication competence lens, students’ accounts of instructor swearing were inductively analyzed to understand students’ perceptions of the swear word's function and target. Coding revealed seven functions of teacher swearing: emphasize/elaborate, accommodate students, be humorous, show frustration, gain attention, instructor personality/disposition, and accidental. Six targets of teacher swearing were also found: swearing directed toward course content, noncourse content, the self (instructor), students, course assignments, and job tools. Swearing directed at course content, swearing used to emphasize/elaborate, to gain attention, and to be humorous were perceived as more appropriate than other categories. Classroom implications and instructor recommendations are offered.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Mark A. Generous
Mark A. Generous is a doctoral student at the Hugh Downs School of Human Communication at Arizona State University—Tempe
Seth S. Frei
Seth S. Frei is a doctoral student in the Department of Communication Studies at The University of Texas at Austin
Marian L. Houser
Marian L. Houser is a Professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Texas State University.