Publication Cover
Society & Natural Resources
An International Journal
Volume 26, 2013 - Issue 6
1,068
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Tribute Articles

Recreancy Revisited: Beliefs about Institutional Failure Following the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill

, &
Pages 655-671 | Received 19 Sep 2011, Accepted 16 Mar 2012, Published online: 28 Aug 2012
 

Abstract

In 1993, Freudenburg suggested the term “recreancy” to refer to behaviors associated with institutional failures, which he distinguished from the consequences of such failures. This article revisits issues related to recreancy associated with the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill. Using qualitative data collected in Cordova, Alaska, between 2002 and 2010, we examine notions about recreancy and technological disasters. Findings highlight perceptions of institutional failures associated with the spill and cleanup activities, providing insights into the social consequences of such failures for those most directly affected by them, including loss of ontological security, the emergence of corrosive communities, and diminished social capital. We extend the discussion about recreancy to include organizational processes intended to address economic, social, and environmental consequences of technological disasters. Our data reveal a persistence of beliefs about recreancy associated with the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the subsequent litigation, and their consequences for long-term community impacts.

Acknowledgments

Major funding for this research was provided by grants from the National Science Foundation, Arctic Social Science Division: ARC-1042926, DDP-910109, OPP-0082405, OPP-002572, and OPP-0852932. Additional support was provided by the Natural Hazards Center, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, and the Department of Sociology and College of Arts & Sciences, Oklahoma State University. The technical support provided by Sandra Gray and Nnenia Campbell is most appreciated. The contents and interpretations in this article are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the policy or position of the National Science Foundation.

Notes

As defined by Putnam, social capital is “connections among individuals—social networks and the norms of reciprocity and trustworthiness that arise from them” (Citation2000, 19).

In 2002–2003, author Ritchie conducted 48 interviews with subjects selected using a “criterion-based selection” sample design (for details, see Ritchie Citation2004). In 2009–2010, 35 of the original 48 study participants were reinterviewed by authors Ritchie and Gill.

A fundamental challenge associated with presenting the findings of qualitative research in peer-reviewed publications is page limitations that preclude inclusion of more than a small subset of available data. The quotes presented here are representative of a convergence of themes in the data and of narratives, as well as quantitative data cited but not included in the article (e.g., see Ritchie Citation2004, Citation2012). Although the comments were made by individuals, they reflect community processes and the consequences of both recreancy and perceptions of recreancy.

For a discussion of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms see Marshall, Picou, and Schlichtmann (Citation2004).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 260.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.