Abstract
Community resource management areas (CREMAs) in Ghana are protected areas managed under a community-based governance regime. This study examined five CREMAs to understand how desired outcomes and perceived performance of these CREMAs vary at a regional level, and the factors that might account for this variability. Importance-performance analysis showed that for all 29 outcomes examined, importance exceeded performance, indicating a need to improve on performance, but perhaps also to create more realistic expectations. Desired outcomes were factor analyzed, and the socioeconomic factor was rated as the most desired group of outcomes but was also the factor with the largest gap between desired and perceived achieved scores. Rankings of outcomes varied among the CREMAs, with attributes such as the role of external agents, communication strategies, social–ecological contexts, and local leadership appearing to be important. The demonstrated variability emphasizes the need to understand inter-CREMA variability in designing possible management interventions.
Notes
1In northern Ghana land tenure is held by earth priests (tindana) and in southern Ghana land tenure is held by “stools” or by families/clans. They symbolize the collective stewardship and ownership of lands and, in theory, all the natural resources on the land.
2The Protected Area and Poverty Reduction: A Canada-Africa Research and Learning Alliance (PAPR) Project was jointly funded by the International Development Research Centre of Canada and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
3Table provides a legend for the numbers.
4Togbe Allega III is currently the chairman of Avu Lagoon CREMA Executive Committee.
5Zintang Mohammed is the coordinator of the Traditional Healers Association.
6Nantiera Cosmos is the assembly member for the Zukpiri CREMA.
7David Yakubu is a retired regional coordinating director of the Upper West Region of Ghana.