184
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The Global End-Diastolic Volume (GEDV) Could Be More Appropiate to Fluid Management Than Central Venous Pressure (CVP) During Closed Hyperthermic Intrabdominal Chemotherapy with CO2 Circulation

, PhD, MD, , PhD, MD, , PhD, MD, , PhD, MD, , MD, , MD, , PhD & , PhD, MD show all
Pages 321-327 | Received 05 May 2017, Accepted 27 Apr 2017, Published online: 30 May 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Closed hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may increase abdominal pressure and effects of hemodynamic changes due to maintenance hyperthermia. Our aim was to analyze the safety and effectiveness of our closed technique with CO2 circulation in management fluid status and hemodynamic parameters by means of cardiac preload control measured by Global End Diastolic Values (GEDV) and a gas exchanger. Material and Methods: A Pilot Clinical Study that included 18 advanced ovarian cancer patients undergoing citoreductive surgery and HIPEC. We used a closed-perfusion system (PRS Combat®) that includes CO2 circulation and a gas exchanger. Transpulmonary thermodilutions and hemodynamic measurements (PiCCO2®) were performed after citoreductive surgery (Pre-HIPEC); At half time of the HIPEC (Intra-HIPEC); After HIPEC (Post-HIPEC). Results: No significant hemodynamic measurements changes in the three thermodilutions values of Cardiac Index (CI) (p = 0.227), Global End Diastolic Values (GEVD) (p = 0.966), Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) (p = 0,884) and Systemic Vascular Resistance Index (SVRI) (p = 0.082). No correlation between central venous pressure (CVP) and GEDV (Pre-HIPEC: r = 0.164, p = 0.211; Intra-HIPEC: r = 0.015, p = 0.900; Post-HIPEC: r = 0.018, p = 0.890). There was better correlation between GEDV and CI (Pre-HIPEC: r = 0.432, p = 0.071; Intra-HIPEC: r = 0.418, p = 0.074; Post-HIPEC: r = 0.411, p = 0.080). Conclusions: Closed intrabdominal chemotherapy with CO2 circulation model may be a safe model for HIPEC by means of a gas exchanger. GEDV and its changes significantly correlated to CI, and not observed for CVP. GEDV values may be more appropriate for monitoring cardiac preload, blood loss limitation and to predict changes in intravascular volume status during intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Conflict of interest: All authors have no conflict of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.