ABSTRACT
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical effects of treating thoracolumbar fractures with posterior limited long-segment pedicle instrumentation (LLSPI). Methods: A total of 58 thoracolumbar fracture patients were retrospectively analyzed, including 31 cases that were fixed by skipping the fractured vertebra with 6 screws using LLSPI and 27 cases that were fixed by skipping the fractured vertebra with 4 screws using short-segment pedicle instrumentation (SSPI). Surgery time, blood loss, hospital stay, Oswestry disability index (ODI), neurological function, sagittal kyphotic Cobb angle (SKA), percentage of anterior vertebral height (PAVH), instrumentation failure, and the loss of SKA and PAVH were recorded before and after surgery. Results: No significant differences were observed in either the surgery time or hospital stay (P < 0.05), while there were significant differences in blood loss between the two groups. At the final follow-up, both the ODI and the neurological status were notably improved compared to those at the preoperative state (P < 0.05), but the difference between the two groups was relatively small. Furthermore, the SKA and PAVH were notably improved at the final follow-up compared to postoperative values (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed between the two groups. During long-term follow-up, the loss of SKA and PAVH in the LLSPI group was significantly less than that in the SSPI group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Based on strict criteria for data collection and analysis, the clinical effects of LLSPI for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures were satisfactory, especially for maintaining the height of the fractured vertebra and reducing the loss of SKA and instrumentation failure rates.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to express my gratitude to all those who have helped me during the writing of this paper. I gratefully acknowledge the help of my supervisor Professor Haiyang YU. I do appreciate her patience, encouragement, and professional instructions during the writing of this paper.
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.