299
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

A Systematic Review of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Situs Inversus

, MDORCID Icon, , MD, , MD, , MD & , MD, FACS
Pages 324-333 | Published online: 04 Jun 2019
 

Abstract

Background: In case of situs inversus (SI), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is challenging. This systematic review aimed to assess the appropriate technique for LC in SI.

Methods: An electronic search was carried out using the following keywords: “Situs inversus” and “Laparoscopic cholecystectomy”. The main endpoints were surgical procedures, intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) use, common bile detection, operative time, bile duct injury, conversion, mortality, and morbidity.

Results: We retained 93 cases. Essentially two types of laparoscopy port placement reported were reported: the “American mirror technique” and the “French mirror technique”. One report of a left-handed surgeon was retained. Fourteen cases operated by a right-handed surgeon: “American mirror technique” used in 33 cases and “French mirror technique” used in 7 cases. The operative time was mentioned in 52 cases with a mean of 74 min without any statistical difference between the two techniques. No cases of postoperative death, major complications or bile duct injury were reported. IOC was performed in 16 cases (17.2%). An associated common bile duct stone was found in eight cases (8.6%). ERCP with endoscopic sphincterotomy was used to treat the associated CBD stones in 7 cases and a choledecoscopy was conducted in one case to extract stones. The conversion rate in this systematic review was 1.07%.

Conclusions: LC in SI is easier for left-handed surgeons. The fastest technique for right-handed surgeons seems to be the “American mirror technique” and some modifications of the port placement can facilitate it.

This article is referred to by:
Technique for Improving the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Challenging Cases

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

This research involves Human participants, it is a retrospective analysis of published cases and did not require informed consent.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.