Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, with more than 275,000 newly diagnosed cases discovered every year, in the United States. Breast cancer accounts for about 30% of cancers among females.Citation1 Although the prognosis of patients affected by the early-stage disease is excellent, patients with tumors spreading outside of the breast and to regional lymph nodes decreased dramatically.Citation2
At the time of diagnosis, tumor size and lymphatic dissemination are the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer patients.Citation3 Determining the presence of cancer cells in the regional lymph nodes is essential from a prognostic and therapeutic point of view, since identifying the extra-mammary disease is important to tailor postoperative treatments and scheduling adequate surveillance.Citation4 Sentinel lymph node biopsy has replaced axillary lymphadenectomy in staging the axilla.Citation5 Sentinel node mapping aims to remove the first lymph node(s) to which a tumor is likely to spread. Level A evidence highlighted that patients having sentinel node mapping had similar 5-year outcomes than patients having full dissection.Citation5 Several techniques for the identification of sentinel nodes have been studied and implemented.Citation6,Citation7
The current ongoing COVID-19 outbreak is changing our practice as COVID-19 threatens to curtail patient access to evidence-based treatment.Citation8–14 Reducing the in-hospital risk of COVID-19 transmission is a priority. In the paper published in this issue,Citation15 the authors evaluated the impact of not performing delayed lymphoscintigraphic images for minimizing the in-hospital waiting time. The authors compared outcomes of 74 and 73 patients managed before and during the COVID-19 outbreak, respectively. All patients underwent sentinel node mapping for early-stage breast cancer: the 74 patients having treatments before the pandemic had lymphoscintigraphy with the evaluation of both the early and delayed images, while the 73 patients having treatment during the pandemic had early images only. Sentinel nodes were more likely to be detected in patients having both early and late images available, although there was not a statistically significant difference. Owing to the failure of sentinel node identification, axillary dissection was performed in two (2.7%) and seven (9.6%) patients in the pre-pandemic and pandemic period, respectively.Citation15 Authors discuss that the percentage of sentinel node identification might have been higher if delayed images could have been taken, therefore performing fewer axillary dissections. The paper raises a question on the consequences of shortening the in-hospital waiting time, when reducing this time could potentially have an impact on the standard of care of axillary staging.
Recently published recommendations on managing cancer patients during COVID 19 pandemic mostly focus on prioritization and optimization of treatments for these patients based on breast cancer type and preoperative staging.Citation8–14 Future studies will have to evaluate their overall impact on clinical outcomes.
Nonetheless, the execution of axillary dissection correlates with worse Quality of Life and overall patients outcomes.Citation16 It increases operative time, length of hospital stay, and the risk of developing postoperative morbidity.Citation17 All those represent critical features during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reducing hospital stay, improving postoperative recovery, and promoting early discharge have a crucial role. Additionally, from this point of view, the adoption of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) would improve the outcomes of patients having surgery and their postoperative recovery for breast cancer patientsCitation18 as reported for other malignancies.Citation19 Further efforts are necessary to improve the outcomes of cancer patients during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interests was reported by the author(s).
References
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2020; 70(1):7–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590.
- van der Meer DJ, Kramer I, van Maaren MC, et al. Comprehensive trends in incidence, treatment, survival and mortality of first primary invasive breast cancer stratified by age, stage and receptor subtype in the Netherlands between 1989-2017. Int J Cancer. 2020; 30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33417.
- Soerjomataram I, Louwman MW, Ribot JG, et al. An overview of prognostic factors for long-term survivors of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008; 107(3):309–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9556-1.
- Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: [email protected], et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(8):1194–1220. Aug 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz173.
- Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(10):927–933. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70207-2.
- Goonawardena J, Yong C, Law M. Use of indocyanine green fluorescence compared to radioisotope for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2020; 220(3):665–676. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.001.
- Gennaro M, Listorti C, Mariani L, et al. Oncological safety of selective axillary dissection after axillary reverse mapping in node-positive breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020; Nov 1:S0748-7983(20)30868-4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.10.031.
- Dietz JR, Moran MS, Isakoff SJ, et al. Recommendations for prioritization, treatment, and triage of breast cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. the COVID-19 pandemic breast cancer consortium. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;181(3):487–497. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05644-z.
- -Curigliano G, Cardoso MJ, Poortmans P, editorial board of The Breast, et al. Recommendations for triage, prioritization and treatment of breast cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Breast. 2020;52:8–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.04.006.
- Indini A, Aschele C, Cavanna L, et al. Reorganisation of medical oncology departments during the novel coronavirus disease-19 pandemic: a nationwide Italian survey. Eur J Cancer. 2020; 132:17–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2020.03.024.
- Bogani G, Apolone G, Ditto A, et al. Impact of COVID-19 in gynecologic oncology: a Nationwide Italian Survey of the SIGO and MITO groups. J Gynecol Oncol. 2020; 31(6):e92.doi:https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e92.
- Cavaliere D, Parini D, Marano L, et al. Surgical management of oncologic patient during and after the COVID-19 outbreak: practical recommendations from the Italian society of Surgical Oncology. Updates Surg. 2020; 12:1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00921-4.
- Al‐Shamsi HO, Alhazzani W, Alhuraiji A, et al. A practical approach to the management of cancer patients during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: An international collaborative group. Oncologist. 2020;25(6):e936–e945. doi:https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0213.
- Ahmed M. Optimizing breast cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Breast Cancer. 2020; 27(6):1045–1047. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01160-6.
- Yüksel C, Çulcu S, Doğan L. The effects of modified lymphoscintigraphy techniques on sentinel lymph node biopsy success during the COVID-19 pandemic period. J Invest Surg. 2020; 15:1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2020.1859022.
- Leysen L, Beckwée D, Nijs J, et al. Risk factors of pain in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2017; 25(12):3607–3643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3824-3.
- Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(12):1303–1310. Epub 2014 Oct 15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70460-7.
- Smith TW, Jr, Wang X, Singer MA, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: A clinical review of implementation across multiple surgical subspecialties. Am J Surg. 2020; 219(3):530–534. Mar. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.11.009.
- Bogani G, Sarpietro G, Ferrandina G, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gynecology oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020; 28:S0748-7983(20)30867-2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.10.030.