In a recently published randomized controlled trial, the authors compared the effectiveness of an erector spinae plane (ESP) block versus a subcostal transversus abdominis plane (STAP) block for postoperative pain management in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy [Citation1]. This study was well-designed and replicable in clinical practice, and provides a systematic comparison of two truncal blocks which are commonly used in multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The results showed a more favorable analgesic effect with the ESP block compared to the STAP block. However, we questioned the fundamental analgesic regimen for enhanced recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard for the treatment of gallbladder disease, with the advantages being minimal invasiveness, less postoperative pain, and faster recovery. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery have shown beneficial outcomes, not only in terms of reducing opioid consumption, but also in reducing the number of adverse events and achieving a shorter hospital stay [Citation2,Citation3]. To our best knowledge, there are no reports of ERAS guidelines for minor abdominal procedures, such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We were thus interested to see how the authors used multimodal analgesia, which is one of the core elements of ERAS protocols, in their comparative study of EPS and STAP blocks [Citation1]. The authors report using a routine multimodal analgesia regimen including a preoperative ESP or STAP block, intraoperative paracetamol and tenoxicam, postoperative intravenous paracetamol, and patient-controlled fentanyl analgesia. Our major concern with this study is that we found it partially against ERAS guidelines to use patient-controlled fentanyl analgesia and meperidine as a rescue in laparoscopic surgery. The purpose of multimodal analgesia is to reduce opioid consumption and associated adverse events for enhanced recovery after abdominal surgery [Citation4].
Acute pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy may arise from somatic (abdominal wall and/or peritoneum), visceral (gallbladder), and referred (shoulder) impulses [Citation5]. A more central approach (i.e., ESP block) might provide better pain relief than a peripheral approach (i.e., transversus abdominis plane block). A STAP block prevents somatic pain of the anterior abdomen via a neurovascular plane from T6 to T10. This blocks both somatic and visceral pain via the ventral, dorsal, and communicating rami of the spinal nerves. Two randomized controlled trials have now shown that ESP is superior to TAP when added to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for pain management after laparoscopic cholecystectomy [Citation1,Citation6]. In another randomized controlled trial, a bilateral ESP block was as effective as a bilateral STAP block in combination with patient-controlled morphine analgesia [Citation7]. Both blocks were better than the port-site local infiltration in the analgesic and recovery profiles.
In an evidence-based pain control protocol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, multimodal analgesia with restrictive opioid use is highly recommended [Citation8]. This updated pain management review suggested that both surgical techniques (i.e., pneumoperitoneum) and analgesic medication (i.e., paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) were important components of routine analgesia. The STAP block was considered to be an adjuvant when routine analgesia was inadequate. An increasing number of studies support the ESP block being implemented in multimodal analgesia from chest and abdominal to lumbar spine surgery [Citation9]. With more evidence, the ESP block has the potential to be incorporated into the ERAS guidelines.
This study is significant as a model for multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The evidence showed that multimodal analgesia was associated with better pain management, lower opioid doses, fewer adverse events, and reduced chronic postoperative pain. We believe that nerve blocks, as a part of the analgesia regimen, have the potential to be implemented in more ERAS protocols for various types of surgery.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate the great help from Taylor & Francis Editing Services.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no financial interests nor conflicts of interest.
Funding
Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital, Grant/Award Number: H-109-001.
References
- Ozdemir H, Araz C, Karaca O, Turk E. Comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized, controlled trial. J Invest Surg. 2021; in press.
- McCarthy RJ, Ivankovich KG, Ramirez EA, et al. Association of the addition of a transversus abdominis plane block to an enhanced recovery program with opioid consumption, postoperative antiemetic use, and discharge time in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a retrospective study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020;45(3):180–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2019-101009.
- Zhang X, Zhu J, Ye B, Yashengaili A, Xu L, Li X. Combination of epidural blockade and parecoxib in enhanced recovery after gastrointestinal surgery [published online ahead of print January 21, 2020]. J Invest Surg. 2020;21:1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1690601.
- Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60(3):289–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12651.
- Chin KJ, McDonnell JG, Carvalho B, Sharkey A, Pawa A, Gadsden J. Essentials of our current understanding: abdominal wall blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42(2):133–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000545.
- Altıparmak B, Korkmaz Toker M, Uysal AI, Kuşçu Y, Gümüş Demirbilek S. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia of adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2019;57:31–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.03.012.
- Ibrahim M. Erector spinae plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, is there a difference? A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Essays Res. 2020;14(1):119–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_144_19.
- Barazanchi AWH, MacFater WS, Rahiri JL, Tutone S, Hill AG, Joshi GP, ROPSPECT collaboration. Evidence-based management of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospect review update. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(4):787–803. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.023.
- Huang J, Liu JC. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20(1):83. Published 2020 Apr 14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00999-8.