Abstract
In this article we explore the relationship between feminist art therapy and anthropology. We suggest that there is a series of congruities between a feminist approach to art therapy and strands of contemporary anthropological practice concerned with understanding other people's interior thoughts and the potential of art to make critical interventions. To examine these issues we position feminist art therapy approaches at an interface between existing explorations that have created intersections between anthropology and both arts and therapeutic practices. In this context we will suggest that the application of the methodologies developed in feminist art therapy can combine the potential suggested by both of these approaches, to offer anthropologists routes to understanding interiorities and interventions in conventional narrative forms of representation.
Notes
Irving and Rapport posed this question as part of a call for a conference panel at the ASA 2009 conference. While we were unable to attend the conference we were nevertheless inspired to follow through on this question. (Online at http://www.nomadit.co.uk/asa/asa09/panels.php5?PanelID=551, accessed December 19, 2009.)
The French have a word which Henriques et al. [Citation1984: 1] suggest encapsulates an active and complex subjectivity that acknowledges the individual as an active agent in the production of their subjectivity through a process of assujettissement. There is no English equivalent; however, the reflexive verb which means “to make subject” or to “produce subjectivity” as well as to “submit” or “subjugate” is perhaps rather negative with respect to subjugation. It is conceivably a more neutral term that is needed to encapsulate our coming into being—being made and making simultaneously. The lack of a suitable word for this process illustrates an entrenched dichotomy between self and society and a conceptual “hole” in post-structuralist theory.