Publication Cover
Inhalation Toxicology
International Forum for Respiratory Research
Volume 31, 2019 - Issue 7
1,583
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Toxicity assessment of electronic cigarettes

, &
Pages 259-273 | Received 22 Mar 2019, Accepted 18 Sep 2019, Published online: 26 Sep 2019
 

Abstract

Sale of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) products has exponentially increased in the past decade, which raise concerns about its safety. This updated review provides the available toxicology profile of e-cigarettes, summarizing evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies. Data regarding which components in e-liquids exhibit potential toxicities are inconsistent. Some studies have reported that nicotine plays a significant role in inducing adverse outcomes and that solvents alone do not induce any adverse effects. However, other studies have suggested that nicotine is not associated with any adverse outcomes, whereas solvents and flavorings are the key components to elicit considerable deleterious effects on cells or animals. In addition, most of the studies that have compared the toxicity of e-cigarettes with tobacco cigarettes have suggested that e-cigarettes are less toxic than tobacco cigarettes. Nevertheless, scientific evidence regarding the toxicity profile of e-cigarette is insufficient owing to the lack of a standardized research approach. In the future, scientific toxicology data derived from standardized testing protocols including nicotine, ingredients analysis, the various e-cigarette devices made from different materials are urgently needed for thorough toxicology assessment. This review aims to update the toxicity profiles, identify knowledge gaps, and outline future directions for e-cigarettes research, which would greatly benefit public health professionals.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Professor Philip Demokritou from Harvard School of Public Health for his suggestions regarding the structuring of this article.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This review was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81502778], and by Startup Fund for Youngman Research at SJTU [SFYR at SJTU, grant number 19X100040040] and the Health and Family Planning Commission of Heilongjiang Province [grant number, 2014-426].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 389.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.