Balanced crystalloids versus isotonic saline in pediatric sepsis: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose

We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to compare the effects of balanced crystalloids (BC) and isotonic saline (IS) in pediatric sepsis.

Methods

A systematic search was performed for studies comparing BC and IS in pediatric sepsis. Outcomes included mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), hospital length of stay (LOS), and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) LOS. A random-effect models was used to calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

The analysis included six studies with 8753 children. BC demonstrated significant reductions in overall mortality (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.98, P = 0.03, I² = 0%) and AKI (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.96, P = 0.03, I² = 37%) compared to IS. RRT need was similar between the BC and IS groups (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.02, P = 0.07, I² = 0%). Hospital and PICU LOS did not differ significantly. However, subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials revealed significantly shorter hospital LOS in the BC group (mean difference −0.66 days, 95% CI −1.10 to −0.23, P = 0.003, I² = 0%).

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis demonstrates that using BC in pediatric sepsis is associated with reduced mortality, AKI, and hyperchloremia rates compared to IS, while maintaining similar hospital and PICU LOS. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

Keywords:

• Balanced crystalloids
• isotonic saline
• lactated ringer
• pediatric sepsis

Disclosure statement

The authors report no funding or conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

The authors report no funding or conflicts of interest.