0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Real-World Experience of Fluocinolone Acetonide 0.19 mg in the Management of Non-Infectious Uveitis

, MBBSORCID Icon, , MBBSORCID Icon, , MD, , MD, , MBBSORCID Icon, , MDORCID Icon & , MDORCID Icon show all
Received 29 Apr 2024, Accepted 26 Jun 2024, Published online: 23 Jul 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety profile of fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implants for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis (NIU).

Methods

A retrospective, observational study was conducted at Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, involving patients who received FAc 0.19 mg implants (Iluvien®) for NIU. 2-year follow-up data on baseline characteristics, indications, and outcomes was collected. The primary indicator for treatment failure was defined as the need for rescue treatment with dexamethasone (DEX) implants, while secondary indicators included changes in steroid and systemic immunosuppression requirements, or the need for a second FAc implant before 3 years. The occurrence of complications was collected.

Results

Of the 146 eyes treated with FAc implants, 24.0% experienced treatment failure requiring DEX implant within 2 years. About 42.9% required this within the first 6 months. There was an increase in the number of patients requiring steroids and/or systemic immunosuppression. Within the first 2 years post-FAc implant, only 13.7% experienced an IOP rise, with 4.1% requiring IOP-lowering surgery. About 57.9% of the phakic eyes developed cataracts.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable real-world evidence supporting the efficacy of FAc implant in NIU. It demonstrates a good safety profile at 2 years, with a significant reduction in uveitis recurrence rate and treatment burden. Our results are especially pertinent to the treatment of uveitic cystoid macular oedema (CMO), which was the primary indication in over 75% of our patients. Furthermore, it suggests that while FAc implant controls retinal inflammation effectively, choroidal inflammation would require alternative treatment.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Harry Petrushkin, Colin Chu, Jose Carlo Artiaga, Rasheed Rajna, Stella Fragkopoulou, and Noha Soliman (Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust).

Disclosure statement

Carlos Pavesio is a consultant for Alimera Sciences (Aldershot, Hampshire, UK), EYEVENSYS (Paris, France), Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Japan), and AbbVie, Inc. (North Chicago, IL, USA). The other authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported that there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 815.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.