Treatment and prevention of ocular motility restrictions with amniotic membrane transplantation

ABSTRACT

We intend to investigate the indications, complications, and final results of amniotic membrane (AM) transplantation in ocular motility restrictions. Surgeons have tried to prevent restrictive adhesions between the extraocular muscles and surrounding tissues because they cause unpredictable results. AM transplantation wrapping extraocular musculature has been proposed as a technique with good results for this purpose. A search was carried out in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrial, Lilac and Ibecs databases, using the indexed terms” amnion”, “strabismus,” “strabismus-subheading-surgery” and “ocular motility disorders.” The only exclusion criteria were studies conducted in non-humans or studies with insufficient data on eye motility. No study was discarded for analysis because of language, age or methodology. This review includes 165 patients (223 eyes), with a mean follow-up of 11.49 months. The mean age was 21 years old, 47% were males and 57% were children. 14 studies conducted in humans were eligible: 4 single case, 8 case series, 1 cohort study and 1 randomized clinical trial. In the vast majority of these papers, use of AM transplantation to treat (12 out of 14 papers) or either to prevent (2 out of 14 papers) motility restrictions or restrictive strabismus secondary to muscular adhesions. All the studies except one presents very favorable results improving postsurgical eye motility. The cryopreservation method was more widely used, presenting a good safety profile with few adverse effects in the short and medium term. Significant improvement was reported in most patients after the use of amniotic membrane transplantation to treat or prevent ocular motility limitations. Very few complications or adverse effects were documented.

KEYWORDS:

• Strabismus
• amnion
• ocular motility disorders
• eye movements
• ophthalmologic surgical procedures

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.