ABSTRACT
Purpose
Infants with anophthalmia or microphthalmia frequently have co-occurring birth defects. Nonetheless, there have been few investigations of birth defect patterns among these children. Such studies may identify novel multiple malformation syndromes, which could inform future research into the developmental processes that lead to anophthalmia/microphthalmia and assist physicians in determining whether further testing is appropriate.
Methods
This study includes cases with anophthalmia/microphthalmia identified by the Texas Birth Defects Registry from 1999 to 2014 without clinical or chromosomal diagnoses of recognized syndromes. We calculated adjusted observed-to-expected ratios for two – through five-way birth defect combinations involving anophthalmia/microphthalmia to estimate whether these combinations co-occur more often than would be expected if they were independent. We report combinations observed in ≥5 cases.
Results
We identified 653 eligible cases with anophthalmia/microphthalmia (514 [79%] with co-occurring birth defects), and 111 birth defect combinations, of which 44 were two-way combinations, 61 were three-way combinations, six were four-way combinations and none were five-way combinations. Combinations with the largest observed-to-expected ratios were those involving central nervous system (CNS) defects, head/neck defects, and orofacial clefts. We also observed multiple combinations involving cardiovascular and musculoskeletal defects.
Conclusion
Consistent with previous reports, we observed that a large proportion of children diagnosed with anophthalmia/microphthalmia have co-occurring birth defects. While some of these defects may be part of a sequence involving anophthalmia/microphthalmia (e.g., CNS defects), other combinations could point to as yet undescribed susceptibility patterns (e.g., musculoskeletal defects). Data from population-based birth defect registries may be useful for accelerating the discovery of previously uncharacterized malformation syndromes.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the staff at the Texas Department of State Health Services Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch and Center for Health Statistics for their contributions to this research. The Texas Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch is supported in part by the Title V Block Grant.
Data availability statement
Due to the nature of the Data Use Agreements (DUAs) executed between the participating agencies and institutions and the requirements for confidentiality, study data cannot be made publicly available.
Financial support
This work was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development under Grant R01 HD093660-03 and by the National Eye Institute under Grant U01 EY032403.
Disclosure of interest statement
None of the authors have any proprietary interests or conflicts of interest related to this submission.
Statement of originality
This work has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Supplementary material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website.