Ophthalmologists’ Perspective on Barriers to Cataract Surgery and Surgical Productivity in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Zambia: A Descriptive, Mixed-Methods Survey

ABSTRACT

Purpose

While progress was made towards the Vision 2020: The Right to Sight goals, Ethiopia, Ghana, and Zambia fell short of the recommended cataract surgical rate (CSR) on a national level. Post-operative cataract surgical outcomes are also lower compared to other regions. This study aimed to describe perceived barriers to cataract surgical uptake, factors related to surgeon surgical productivity, and surgical offerings in each of these countries.

Methods

An online survey was sent to ophthalmologists practicing in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Zambia. Responses were collected between June 25, 2021 and January 30, 2022.

Results

Responses were received from 122 ophthalmologists from Ethiopia, Ghana, and Zambia. The estimated participation rate was 47% (122/257). Distance to cataract surgical centres, lack of surgical centres, and lack of surgical equipment were among the top 10 most agreed upon barriers by respondents within each country. Many respondents reported that current financial reimbursement does not incentivise maximum productivity in themselves (56%, 68/122) or their staff (61%, 74/122). Surgeons proposed several ways to improve productivity incentives. Private practice was perceived to have the best reimbursement incentives (77%, 94/122), whereas government hospitals were least agreed upon (4%, 5/122). Discrepancies in timely post-operative refraction and eyeglasses disbursement were reported.

Conclusions

Overcoming the identified barriers, improving surgeon productivity, and addressing identified deficits in cataract care will likely reduce the backlog of cataract blindness while ensuring increasingly improved patient outcomes.

KEYWORDS:

• Cataracts
• barriers
• cataract surgery
• Africa
• productivity

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the assistance of Matt Oliva with the development of the questionnaire.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplementary data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2023.2301581.

Additional information

Funding

Time support from Brigham Young University Life Sciences CURA Grant.