ABSTRACT
Interrelations of two measurement methods (cognitive versus behavioral ratings) for executive function (EF) were examined and related to reading comprehension and math calculations in fourth and fifth grade students (n = 93) in the context of a diverse urban student population. Relations among measures within four EF processes (working memory, planning, inhibition and shifting) were modest; relations to academics were stronger. EF measures contributed to both academic outcomes even in the context of relevant covariates (age, language and educational program). Working memory was particularly important for reading comprehension across measurement type. Cognitive measures from all EF processes, particularly inhibition and planning, and behavioral ratings of working memory were important for math.
Acknowledgements
The attitudes and opinions expressed in this presentations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the funding agency. The authors thank the coworkers, parents, teachers, and school and district officials who made this research possible.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.