Abstract
Arising from a study which explored the development children's concept of a substance (ages 11-14), this two-part paper focuses on the idea of chemical change. Part one considers substance identity and pupils' interaction with the scientific idea of melting and boiling behaviour as a means for identification and the assessment of purity. Evidence is presented which suggests that children do not 'naturally' have a concept of substance identity which allows them to recognize chemical change as a possibility. Instead, their thinking is in terms of the history of samples. The scientific idea of identity led to a confrontation with the idea of chemical change but the pupils were unwilling to accept this phenomenon. The preference was to view the product of a chemical change as a 'mix' of the original substances rather than as a substance in its own right. Implications for teaching are discussed. Part two (in press) goes on to examine the issue of explaining chemical change.