Improving Outcomes for Looked after Children: A Critical Analysis of Kinship Care

Abstract

Although UK law and policy favour family and friends care, the number of children placed in kinship care remains low compared to other countries such as the USA and Australia, and there is professional uncertainty as to whether children may be better placed there. This review compares outcomes for looked after children placed in kin and non-kin care and finds stability is achieved more commonly through placement with kin. However, the inherent familiarity of kinship placements can undermine aspects of care quality. Children are more likely to experience problematic parental contact and problems within a child’s immediate family may exist in the child’s wider network. Despite such adversities, emotional and behavioural outcomes are as favourable, or more favourable. The review concludes that although poor quality kin placements do have adverse effects on children’s emotional and behavioural development, stability is a protective factor. Two areas for the development of professional practice are highlighted. Firstly, the need for professionals to provide better support to children and kin carers. Secondly, the need to end inadequate kin placements, sometimes against a child’s wishes, should be better recognised: in some cases children’s needs have been undermined when social workers have allowed inadequate placements to continue.

Keywords:

• foster care
• kinship care
• looked after children
• outcomes

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Lydia Brown

Lydia Brown is a social work practitioner for Wakefield Metropolitan District Council.

Robin Sen

Robin Sen is a lecturer in Child and Family Social Work at the University of Sheffield, Sociological Studies Department, Elmfield, Northumberland Road, Sheffield, S10 2TU, UK.