1,137
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Mobile Life: Biosecurity Practices and Insect Globalization

Pages 16-37 | Published online: 08 Apr 2013
 

Abstract

Recent decades have seen a series of high-profile public health crises involving viruses, bacteria and other biological agents, together with escalating concern over impacts of biological invasion on crops and ecosystems. In the context of intensifying globalization, such hazards are being viewed as serious ‘security’ threats. For critical social theorists, this growing concern with biosecurity at the global scale has worrying implications, in that it promotes a state of fear over ‘life itself’ which is being used to justify heightened surveillance and increasingly intrusive intervention. However, there are alternative perspectives on living with adventitious and unpredictable biological life. For over a century and a half, ‘settler societies' such as Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia have been grappling with the environmental and economic impacts of non-native organisms running wild. Examining events surrounding an incursion of tussock moths in Auckland, it is argued that biosecurity policy can also be viewed as a flexible and evolving response to uncertainties associated with translocated biological life. Furthermore, the ‘peripheral’ tradition of sustained inquiry around the issue of which organisms belong in which places leads us back to questions about the characteristics of insects themselves and about the dynamics of the environments with which they interact. In this way, critical thinking around biosecurity is opened to a depth of engagement with evolutionary and geological processes that offer new dimensions to thinking about the ‘biopolitics' and ‘geopolitics' of encountering life out of bounds.

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Uli Beisel, Ann Kelly and Noémi Tousignant for organizing the ‘Thinking with Insects’ workshop and to all the participants in that rather special gathering.

Notes

There was a degree of public opposition to the aerial spraying programme in Auckland's eastern suburbs. Public opposition became more organized and vociferous in response to the use of the same insecticide in West Auckland in 1999 against the painted apple moth. See Ginsburg (Citation2006) for a critical perspective on the use of Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki in aerial spraying programmes.

For a more philosophical reading of the ‘assemblage’ of insects and flowering plants, see Deleuze and Guattari (Citation1987, p. 10).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 286.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.