209
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Low Dose Ovarian Stimulation Plus Progesterone in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

The effect of low-dose ovarian stimulation with HMG plus progesterone on pregnancy outcome in women with history of recurrent pregnancy loss and secondary infertility: a retrospective cohort study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 528-531 | Received 02 Aug 2017, Accepted 09 Dec 2017, Published online: 12 Feb 2018
 

Abstract

We assessed the outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) following treatment with low-dose human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG)+progesterone or progesterone alone. This single-center retrospective cohort study included data from women diagnosed with RPL and treated between February 2005 and December 2012 with one cycle of HMG + progesterone or progesterone alone. Primary endpoint was the rate of ongoing pregnancies and losses by treatment, age (<38 vs. ≥38 years) and in the subgroup with unexplained RPL. Of 169 RPL patients, 35.5% (n = 60) received HMG + progesterone and 64.5% (n = 109) progesterone alone. Compared to progesterone alone, HMG + progesterone led to a lower, although not significant, frequency of losses (3.3% vs. 11.9%, p = .09) and a twofold higher rate of ongoing pregnancies (41.7% vs. 19.3%, p = .002). Similar results were obtained in the subgroup of patients with unexplained RPL (ongoing pregnancies: 48.1% upon HMG + progesterone vs. 21.3% upon progesterone, p = .03; losses: 0% vs. 8.5%, respectively, p = .29) and in those <38 years (ongoing pregnancies: 47.4% vs. 18.8%, respectively, p = .003; losses: 5.3% vs. 10.9% respectively, p = .47). These findings suggest that HMG in women with RPL may reduce the rate of miscarriages and increase that of live births regardless of RPL cause and in women aged <38 years.

Chinese abstract

我们评估了具有复发性流产(RPL)史的女性应用低剂量人绝经期促性腺激素(HMG)联合黄体酮或者单独黄体酮治疗后的妊娠结局。该单中心回顾性队列研究包含的数据来源于在2005年2月至2012年12月期间被诊断为RPL后接受一个周期HMG 联合黄体酮或者单独黄体酮治疗的女性。该研究的主要终点是治疗后的临床妊娠率和流产率, 年龄(<38岁vs.≥38岁)和不明原因的RPL亚组。在169名RPL患者中, 35.5%(n = 60)接受HMG 联合黄体酮治疗, 64.5%(n = 109)接受单独黄体酮治疗。与单独黄体酮治疗相比, HMG 加黄体酮治疗出现较低的流产率, 尽管无明显统计学差异(3.3% vs. 11.9%, p = .09), 临床妊娠率增加2倍(41.7% vs. 19.3%, p = .002)。在不明原因的RPL患者亚组中获得类似的结果(临床妊娠率: HMG 联合黄体酮组48.1% vs. 单独黄体酮组21.3%, p = .03; 流产率分别为0%和8.5%, p = .29)。在<38岁组中(临床妊娠率:分别为47.4%和18.8%, p = .003; 流产率分别为5.3%和10.9%, p = .47)。这些研究结果表明, 不管是RPL还是年龄<38岁女性的原因, RPL女性应用HMG治疗可能会降低流产率, 并增加活产率。

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.