Publication Cover
Bioacoustics
The International Journal of Animal Sound and its Recording
Volume 26, 2017 - Issue 3
182
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Bull bellows and bugles: a remarkable convergence of low and high-frequency vocalizations between male domestic cattle Bos taurus and the rutting calls of Siberian and North American wapiti

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 271-284 | Received 06 Sep 2016, Accepted 26 Nov 2016, Published online: 02 Jan 2017
 

Abstract

Whereas low-frequency bellows (below 200 Hz) have been investigated in detail in both male and female domestic cattle (Bos taurus), male high-frequency bugle calls (over 800 Hz) have not been described so far in any large bovid species. In this study, high-frequency bugles and low-frequency bellows were recorded from three crossbred free-ranging domestic cattle bulls and analysed spectrographically. The maximum fundamental frequency of bellows was 113.6 Hz, whereas the maximum fundamental frequency of bugles was 958.4 Hz, ranging from 801 to 1125 Hz in different males. These amazingly high fundamental frequencies of bull bugles are comparable with those reported for Siberian wapiti Cervus elaphus sibiricus, but lower than reported values for some subspecies of North American wapiti Cervus canadensis. The similarity with both Siberian and North American wapiti was also observed in the production of bull biphonic bugles with two fundamental frequencies: the low and the high one. We suggest that bugles of domestic cattle bulls provide an excellent model for comparative research with cervid bugles concerning the mechanism of vocal production and the underlying anatomical and behavioural adaptations.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the owner, Christian Schmitt, for his courteous permission to work at the Okambara Ranch, Namibia, and Jörg Melzheimer, Ruben Portas and Vera Mendes, for their great help and support in the field. We are sincerely grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. During our work, we adhered to the “Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching” (Anim. Behav., 2006, 71, 245–253) and to the laws of Namibia, Germany, and the Russian Federation, the countries where the research was conducted.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 254.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.