Abstract
Information-based epistemology maintains that ‘being informed’ is an independent cognitive state that cannot be reduced to knowledge or to belief, and the modal logic KTB has been proposed as a model. But what distinguishes the KTB analysis of ‘being informed’, the Brouwersche schema (B), is precisely its downfall, for no logic of information should include (B) and, more generally, no epistemic logic should include (B), either.
Keywords::
Acknowledgements
I am indebted to Clark Glymour and Kevin Kelly for their comments on an earlier draft. I also benefited from discussions with Luciano Floridi, Franck Lihoreau, Paul Pedersen and Sonja Smets.
Notes
1. Rule RR states that if (p & q) → r is a theorem, then (▪p & ▪q) → ▪r is also a theorem.
2. Specifically, BAM 1 here is ▪(◊∼p → q) → (∼p → ▪q) and p codes ‘the circumference of a circle is a rational number’.
3. Compare to Allo (Citation2011), who proposes a weakening of the KTB analysis that nevertheless succumbs to BAM.
4. Schema (5) is ◊p → ▪◊p.
5. Schema (4) is ▪p → ▪▪p.