148
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Safety and efficacy of low-dose ticagrelor in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 304-311 | Received 03 Feb 2021, Accepted 12 Mar 2021, Published online: 04 Apr 2021
 

Abstract

It remains unclear whether low-dose ticagrelor offers better safety and similar efficacy for Asian patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of low-dose ticagrelor vs standard-dose ticagrelor in Chinese patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this observational cohort study, a total of 2110 ACS patients who were event-free at 3 months after the index PCI were divided into standard-dose ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) (n = 1830) or low-dose ticagrelor (45 mg twice daily) (n = 280) on a background of aspirin 100 mg once daily for at least another 9 months. The primary end point was type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria over a 1-year follow-up period post-PCI. Predictors of the primary end point were identified. Both Cox regression and propensity score matching analyses were used. The cumulative incidence of BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding was lower in the low-dose ticagrelor group vs the standard-dose group either before (adjusted HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07–0.77; p = .016) or after matching (HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.08–0.85; p = .026). A composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was not significantly different between the two groups (0.4% vs 0.9%, respectively). By multivariate analysis, only low-dose ticagrelor was a protected predictor of BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding either before (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09–0.89) or after matching (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07–0.82). A low-dose regimen of ticagrelor might provide better safety than standard-dose ticagrelor in Chinese patients with ACS undergoing PCI.

Disclosure statement

Dr. Mintz receives grant support and/or honoraria from Boston Scientific, Philips, Terumo, and Medtronic. The other authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Capitals’ s Funds for Health Improvement and Research of China (2018-2-2064), National Natural Science Foundations of China (NSFC, Grant No. 81670317 and 82071573) and, Science and technology key project of Beijing municipal education commission (KZ202010025045).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.