Establishing safety stocks for master production schedules

Abstract

The basic master production scheduling problem assumes that periodic demands are known with certainty. Uncertainty in the forecasts arc typically accommodated afterwards by adding safety stocks to a schedule. Two popular methods for establishing safety stocks are: (1) the constant cycle service level method; and (2) the constant safety stock method. This paper outlines these methods and then develops a third method which results in optimal safety stocks. The paper includes an experimental investigation aimed at comparing performances of the three safety stock methods. The constant safety stock method is shown to perform within one or two per cent of optimal, while the constant cycle service level method performs worse under most conditions. Shorter lead times, variable order interval lengths, and time-dependent forecast errors all adversely affect the performances of the non-optimal methods. An operations manager could use these results to evaluate the appropriateness of the methods for his master production scheduling environment.