Postnational constellations of innovativeness: a cosmopolitan approach

Abstract

Innovativeness emerges from the contexts in which individual actors and groups of actors are embedded and which influence their behavior. We refer to that context in terms of culture. The management literature normally understands culture in the sense of Alexis de Tocqueville's ‘habits of the heart’, which is the customs, habits, norms, values, and shared views of reality, expressed in a specific behavior of individuals and groups. This paper confronts established concepts of innovativeness with recent discussions on individualized and globalized societies. According to the sociologist Ulrich Beck, we are interacting more and more in a transnational and transcultural context thereby developing shared habits of the heart beyond the established (mainly geographically bound) understanding of culture. A new culture is emerging, which he introduces as cosmopolitanism. The paper analyses the conditions of innovativeness in cosmopolitan interaction by discussing two examples, the emergence of transnational civil society activism and global cooperation of researchers in the fight against SARS.

Notes

1. C. M. Fiol, Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations, Organization Science, 5, 1994, pp. 403–420.

2. W. M. Cohen and D. A. Levinthal, Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Adminstrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1990, pp. 128–152.

3. S. G. Scott and R. A. Bruce, Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace, Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1994, pp. 580–607; G. R. Oldham and A. Cummings, Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work, Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1996, pp. 607–634; J. E. Perry-Smith and C. E. Shalley, The social side of creativity: a static and dynamic social network perspective, Academy of Management Review, 28, 2003, pp. 89–106.

4. Scott and Bruce, op. cit., Ref. 3.

5. For nations and regions, e.g. M. Pohlmann, Der Kapitalismus in Ostasien. Südkoreas und Taiwans Wege ins Zentrum der Weltwirtschaft (Münster, Westfälisches Dampfboot, 2002); C. Gebhardt, Asia is taking a hard look, Journal of Technology Transfer, Special Issue, Vol. 24(2–3), 1999. For organizations, e.g. P. K. Ahmed, Culture and climate for innovation, European Journal of Innovation Management, 1, 1998, pp. 30–43; E. C. Martins and F. Terblanche, Building organizational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation, European Journal of Innovation Management, 6, 2003, pp. 64–74. For individuals, e.g. C. Ford, A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains, Academy of Management Review, 21, 1996, pp. 1112–1142.

6. M. Pohlmann, The evolution of innovation: cultural backgrounds and the use of innovation models, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(1), 2005, pp. 00–00.

7. Martins and Terblanche, op. cit., Ref. 5.

8. F. Trompenaars and C. Hampden-Turner, Riding the Waves of Culture, 2nd edn (London, Nicholas Brealey, 1997), p. 6.

9. K. Nash, The cultural turn in social theory: towards a theory of cultural politics, Sociology, 35, 2001, pp. 77–92.

10. For nation states, e.g. M. Waters, Globalization (New York, Routledge, 1995); U. Beck, Was ist Globalisierung? (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1997); J. Habermas, Die Postnationale Konstellation (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1998). For organizations (corporations and civil society organizations), e.g. P. Herriot and W. Scott-Jackson, Globalization, social identities and employment, British Journal of Management, 13, 2002, pp. 249–257; S. Goshal and C. Bartlett, The Individualized Corporation (London, Random House, 1998); J. Cohen and A. Arato, Civil Society and Political Theory (Cambridge, MIT Press, 1994). For individuals, e.g. A. Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity (Cambridge, Polity, 1991); U. Beck and E. Beck-Gernsheim (Eds), Riskante Freiheiten, Individualisierung in modernen Gesellschaften (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp 1994); A. Touraine, Pourrons-nous Vivre Ensemble? Egaux et Différents (Paris, Fayard, 1997).

11. J. Habermas, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Vol. 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1981), p. 108.

12. Giddens, op. cit., Ref. 10, p. 244.

13. U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash, Reflexive Modernisierung (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1996).

14. S. Lash, Another Modernity. A Different Rationality (Oxford, Blackwell Publishers, 1999), p. 3.

15. J. Habermas, Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaates, 4th edn (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1994).

16. A. Appadurai, Disjuncture and difference in the global economy, Public Culture, 2, 1990, pp. 15–25; N. J. Smelser, Pressures for continuity in the context of globalization, Current Sociology, 5, 2003, pp. 101–112.

17. J. Habermas, Jenseits des Nationalstaates? Bemerkungen zu Folgeproblemen der wirtschaftlichen Globalisierung, in: U. Beck (Ed.) Politik der Globalisierung (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1998); U. Beck, The cosmopolitan society and its enemies, Theory, Culture & Society, 19, 2002, pp. 17–44; G. Palazzo, Die Mitte der Demokratie. Über die Theorie deliberativer Demokratie von Jürgen Habermas (Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2002).

18. Beck, op. cit., Ref. 17.

19. M. Nava, Cosmopolitan modernity. Everyday imaginaries and the register of difference, Theory, Culture & Society, 19, 2002, pp. 81–99.

20. Beck, op. cit., Ref. 17.

21. Beck, op. cit.

22. B. Barber, Jihad versus McWorld, The Atlantic Monthly, March 1992, pp. 53–65; A. Gorz, Misère du Présent. Richesse du Possible (Paris, Galilée, 1997); R. Sennett, The Corrosion of Character (New York, W.W. Norton, 1998); even Habermas, op. cit., Ref. 17. and Beck, op. cit., Ref. 17.

23. M. Bakardjieva, Virtual togetherness: an everyday-life perspective, Media, Culture & Society, 25, 2003, pp. 291–313.

24. M. Bakardjieva, Virtual togetherness: an everyday-life perspective, Media, Culture & Society, 25, 2003.

25. M. Castells, Materials for an explanatory theory of the network society, British Journal of Sociolgy, 51, 2000, pp. 5–24.

26. R. Scruton, A Dictionary of Political Thought (London, Macmillan, 1982), p. 100.

27. J. Waldron, What is cosmopolitanism?, Journal of Political Philosophy, 8, 2000, pp. 227–243.

28. Beck, op. cit., Ref. 17.

29. Waldron, op. cit., Ref. 27.

30. J. Habermas, op. cit., Ref. 17, pp. 67–84; F. Dallmayr, Cosmopolitanism. Moral and political, Political Theory, 31, 2003, pp. 421–442.

31. Oldham and Cummings, op. cit., Ref. 3; Ford, op. cit., Ref. 5; Ahmed, op. cit., Ref. 5; and C. R. Leana and B. Barry, Stability and change as simultaneous experiences in organizational life, Academy of Management Review, 25, 2000, pp. 753–759; Ahmed, op. cit., Ref. 5; Perry-Smith and Shalley, op. cit., Ref. 3.

32. Oldham and Cummings, op. cit., Ref. 3; Ford, op. cit., Ref. 5; Ahmed, op. cit., Ref. 5.

33. Fiol, op. cit., Ref. 1; Ford, op. cit., Ref. 5.

34. Cohen and Levinthal, op. cit., Ref. 2; Perry-Smith and Shalley, op. cit., Ref. 3.

35. J.-A. Johannessen, J. Olaisen and B. Olsen, Managing and organizing innovation in the knowledge economy, European Journal of Innovation Management, 2, 1999, pp. 116–128.

36. Ahmed, op. cit., Ref. 5.

37. B. S. Cumming, Innovation: overview and future challenges, European Journal of Innovation Management, 1, 1998, pp. 21–29.

38. S. Jones, The democratic dimension of quality, innovation and long-term success, The TQM Magazine, 7, 1995, pp. 36–41.

39. Castells, op. cit., Ref. 25.

40. W. W. Powell, K. W. Koput and L. Smith-Doerr, Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 1996, pp. 116–45.

41. Ford, op. cit., Ref. 5.

42. Ahmed, op. cit., Ref. 5.

43. K. L. Bettenhausen, Five years of group research: what we have learned and what needs to be addressed, Journal of Management, 17, 1991, pp. 345–381.

44. H. G. Barkema, J. A. C. Baum and E. A. Mannix, Management challenges in a new time, Academy of Management Review, 45, 2002, pp. 916–930.

45. Perry-Smith and Shalley, op. cit., Ref. 3.

46. Perry-Smith and Shalley, op. cit.

47. K. Eisenhardt and B. N. Tabrizi, Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1995, pp. 84–110.

48. Cohen and Levinthal, op. cit., Ref. 2.

49. Beck, op. cit., Ref. 17; Herriot and Scott-Jackson, op. cit., Ref. 10.

50. M. W. Lewis, Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide, Academy of Management Review, 25, 2000, pp. 760–776.

51. Johannessen et al., op. cit., Ref. 35.

52. Lewis, op. cit., Ref. 50.

53. T. B. Cannon, Welcome to the Revolution: Managing Paradox in the 21st Century (London, Pitman, 1996), p. 110.

54. Eisenhardt and Tabrizi, op. cit., Ref. 47.

55. Perry-Smith and Shalley, op. cit., Ref. 3.

56. J. M. Podolny and K. L. Page, Network forms of organization, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1998, pp. 57–76.

57. J. M. Podolny and K. L. Page, Network forms of organization, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1998.

58. Barkema et al., op. cit., Ref. 44.

59. Podolny and Page, op. cit., Ref. 56.

60. W. W. Powell and P. Brantley, Competitive co-operation in biotechnology: learning through networks?, in: N. Nohria and R. Eccles (Eds) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action (Boston, Harvard Business School Press, 1992), pp. 366–394.

61. M. Castells, The Rise of the Network Society (Oxford, Blackwell Publishers, 1996); Barkema et al., op. cit., Ref. 44.

62. Johannessen et al., op. cit., Ref. 35; Powell et al., op. cit., Ref. 40.

63. Powell et al., Johannessen et al., op. cit., Ref. 35; Powell et al., op. cit.

64. Barkema et al., op. cit., Ref. 44.

65. Perry-Smith and Shalley, op. cit., Ref. 3.

66. Beck, op. cit., Ref. 17; Habermas, op. cit., Ref. 17.

67. T. Cox, Jr., The multicultural organization, Academy of Management Executive, 5, 2001, pp. 34–47.

68. U. Hannerz, Cosmopolitans and locals in world cultures, Theory, Culture & Society, 7, 1990, pp. 237–251.

69. Nava, op. cit., Ref. 19.

70. J. Urry, Consuming places (London, Routledge, 1995).

71. Beck, op. cit., Ref. 17.

72. R. Boyne, Cosmopolis and risk. A conversation with Ulrich Beck, Theory, Culture & Society, 18, 2001, pp. 47–63.

73. Beck, op. cit., Ref. 17.

74. J. Smith, The battle of Seattle and the future of social movements, Mobilization, 6, 2001, pp. 1–19.

75. J. Smith, Bridging global divides? Strategic framing and solidarity in transnational social movement organizations, International Sociology, 17, 2002, pp. 505–528.

76. J. Smith, Bridging global divides? Strategic framing and solidarity in transnational social movement organizations, International Sociology, 17, 2002.

77. Smith, op. cit., Ref. 74.

78. N. Crossley, Global anti-corporate struggle: a preliminary analysis, British Journal of Sociology, 53, 2002, pp. 667–691.

79. Smith, op. cit., Ref. 74.

80. Smith, op. cit.

81. B. Luverà, La Trappola. Controinchiesta sui Fatti di Genova e sul Movimento Globale (Roma, Editori Riuniti, 2002), pp. 134–172.

82. Smith, op. cit., Ref. 74.

83. Crossley, op. cit., Ref. 78; C. Grefe; M. Greffrath and H. Schumann, Attac. Was wollen die Globalisierungsgegner? (Berlin, Rowohlt, 2002), pp. 141–149.

84. Smith, op. cit., Ref. 75.

85. C. Kalb, Tracking SARS, Newsweek online 28. April 2003, on: http://www.msnbc.com/news/902705.asp?0sl = -21.

86. M. Herper, Special Web sites help scientists fight SARS, 10 April 2003, on Forbes online: http://www.forbes.com/2003/04/10/cx_mh_0410sars.html.

87. Kalb, op. cit., Ref. 85.

88. Nava, op. cit., Ref. 19.

89. Sennett, op. cit., Ref. 22.

90. Podolny and Page, op. cit., Ref. 56.

91. Lewis, op. cit., Ref. 50; Johannessen et al., op. cit., Ref. 35.

92. D. R. Dennison and A. K. Mishra, Towards a theory of organisational culture and effectiveness, Organization Science, 6, 1995, pp. 204–23.

93. Fiol, op. cit., Ref. 1.

94. W. W. Powell, Neither markets nor hierarchy: network forms of organization, Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 1990, pp. 295–336.

95. Podolny and Page, op. cit., Ref. 56.

96. A. Donnellon, B. Gray and M. G. Bougon, Communication, meaning, and organized action, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 1986, pp. 43–55.

97. A. Donnellon, B. Gray and M. G. Bougon, Communication, meaning, and organized action, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 1986.

98. Fiol, op. cit., Ref. 1.

99. E.g. Habermas, op. cit., Ref. 17, Beck, op. cit., Ref. 10; Beck, op. cit., Ref. 17; Touraine, op. cit., Ref. 10; Sennett, op. cit., Ref. 22.