New venture ideas: an analysis of their origin and early development

Abstract

One of the requirements for starting a firm is an idea that can be developed into a business opportunity. This paper focuses on the early development of a firm's business idea and the factors that affect this process. The assumption is that the founders of the firm have a core importance in the formulation of the first draft of the idea, but that the continued development and polishing that turns the idea into a business opportunity occurs in interaction with a number of actors in the market such as clients, financiers, suppliers, and other collaboration partners. Five wholly newly started knowledge-intensive firms—A-TV, A-Tech, S-Tire, M-Qon and M-Point, all of whom are spin-offs from Linköping University or from firms—are analysed. The results of the study agree with previous research on business opportunities and ideas and the link to the skills base of the founders, environmental effects, and changes in the idea over time. Practical and theoretical implications of new venture idea development and entrepreneurship training are presented.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the Technology Bridge Foundation in Linko¨ping for financial support of this study.

Notes

1. J. A. Schumpeter, The Theory of Economic Development (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1934); H. H. Stevenson, A perspective of entrepreneurship, in: H. H. Stevenson, M. J. Roberts and H. Grousbeck (Eds) New Business Venture and the Entrepreneur (Boston, MA, Harvard Business School, 1984); H. E. Aldrich and C. Zimmer, Entrepreneurship through social network, in: R. Smilor and D. Sexton (Eds) The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship (Cambridge, Ballinger, 1986), pp. 2–23; P. Davidsson, Continued entrepreneurship and small firm growth, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, 1989; J. A. Timmons, L. E. Smollen and A. L. Dingee, New Venture Creation: A Guide to Small Business Development, 2nd edn (Homewood, Irwin, 1985); W. D. Bygrave, The Portable MBA in Entrepreneurship, 2nd edn (New York, Wiley, 1997); S. Venkataraman, The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor's perspective, in: J. Katz and J. Brockhaus (Eds), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth (Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, 1997); A. de Koning, Conceptualising opportunity formation as a socio-cognitive process, PhD Dissertation, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France, 1999; H. Landström, Entreprenörskapets rötter, Studentlitteratur, Lund, 2000; R. P. Singh, Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition Through Social Networks (New York, Garland, 2000); F. Delmar and S. Shane, What founders do: a longitudinal study of the start-up process, Paper presented at the Babson College/Kauffman Foundation Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Wellesley, MA, 2002.

2. L. S. Jack and R. A. Anderson, The effects of embeddedness on the entreprenuerial process, Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 2002, pp. 467–487; S. Shane, Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities, Organization Science, 11(4), 2000, pp. 448–469; B. Büchel and S. Raub, Building knowledge—creating value networks, European Management Journal, 20(6), 2002, pp. 587–596.

3. A. Ardishvili, R. Cardozo and R. Sourav, A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development, Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 2003, pp. 105–123.

4. Shane, op. cit., Ref. 2; R. Seamundsson and Å. Lindholm Dahlstrand, How business opportunities constrain young technology-based firms from growing into medium-sized firms, Working Paper, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, 2003.

5. B. Johannisson, Personal networks in emerging knowledge-based firms: spatial and functional patterns, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 10, 1998, pp. 297–312.

6. Singh, op. cit., Ref. 1.

7. Jack and Anderson, op. cit., Ref. 2.

8. Ardichville et al., op. cit., Ref. 3.

9. Ardichville et al., op. cit.

10. Büchel and Raub, op. cit., Ref. 2.

11. D. S. Sarasvathy, Entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial, Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 2003, pp. 203–220; Ardishvili, op. cit., Ref. 3.

12. D. Markman, G. B. Balkin and D. A. R. Baron, Inventors and new venture formation: the effects of general self-efficacy and regretful thinking, Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 27(2), pp. 149–161.

13. Saravashty, op. cit., Ref. 11.

14. Such as for example L. Engwall, Organizational drift as a response to resource dependence, Working Paper No. 4 (Uppsala University, 1985); and T. M. Lodahl and S. M. Mitchell, Initiation, innovation, and institutionalisation in the creation process, in: J. R. Kimberly and R. H. Miles (Eds), The Organizational Life Cycle (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1980), pp. 18–43.

15. Such as A. Ekvall, Affärsidéer, Stockholm, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, Stockholm Universitet, Stockholm, 1990; and R. Normann, Skapande företagsledning (Stockholm, Bonnier Alba, 1975).

16. Normann, Such as A. Ekvall, Affärsidéer, Stockholm, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, Stockholm Universitet, Stockholm, 1990; and R. Normann, Skapande företagsledning (Stockholm, Bonnier Alba, 1975).

17. Normann, Such as A. Ekvall, Affärsidéer, Stockholm, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, Stockholm Universitet, Stockholm, 1990; and R. Normann, Skapande företagsledning (Stockholm, Bonnier Alba, 1975).

18. R. Amit and C. Zott, Value creation in e-business, Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 2001, pp. 493–520.

19. Normann, op. cit., Ref. 15.

20. M. Klofsten, Affärsplattformen—entreprenören och företagets första År (Stockholm, SNS Förlag, 2002).

21. K. H. Vesper, When's the big idea, in: Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (Wellesley, MA, Babson College, 1989), pp. 334–343 (see p. 334).

22. K. H. Vesper, When's the big idea, in: Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (Wellesley, MA, Babson College, 1989), pp. 334–343 (see p. 334).

23. Ekvall, op. cit., Ref. 15.

24. Seamundsson and Lindholm Dahlstrand, op. cit., Ref. 4.; Shane, op. cit., Ref. 2.

25. M. Klofsten, On understanding business development in small technology-based companies, in: Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (Wellesley, MA, Babson College, 1987), pp. 389–391.

26. M. Klofsten, Tidiga utvecklingsprocesser i teknikbaserade företag, PhD Dissertation, Department of Management and Economics, Linköping University, Sweden, 1992; P. Davidsson and M. Klofsten, The business platform model: a practical tool for understanding and analysing firms in early development, New Technology-Based Firms at the New Millennium (Oxford, Elsevier Science, 2003).

27. Vesper, op. cit., Ref. 21.

28. Vesper, op. cit., Ref. 21.