Collaboration between industry and research institutes/universities on industrial innovation in Beijing, China

Abstract

Most R&D resources in China were allocated to public research institutes/universities until the economic transition of the mid 1990s. To maximize the return from these resources, it is important to have a healthy collaboration between industry and research institutes/universities on industrial innovation. This paper examines that relationship and discusses some empirical evidence on its efficiency with particular reference to industry in Beijing. Following a survey of 950 industrial enterprises, the influences of the collaboration relationship on industrial innovation were analyzed. The main findings indicate that the technology novelty of industrial innovation is positively related to that relationship, i.e. the more the collaboration, the higher the technology novelty of the innovation. However, the collaboration relationship is less efficient in terms of economic performance indicators such as innovation sales and profit ratios, to measure innovation. Moreover, the collaboration relationship is still far from efficient in stimulating industrial innovation in China. The major barriers to successful collaboration have also been addressed in this paper with the aim of devising policies and suggesting possible improvements to collaboration efficiency.

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was substantially supported by a strategic research grant (No. 7001450-630) from the City University of Hong Kong. The work was co-supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 70372012). The authors wish to express their grateful appreciation to the Beijing Science and Technology Committee for its assistance in the mass survey and to Ms. Ke Qing and Junxia Wang who assisted in some calculations for this paper.

Notes

1. J. Guan & K. Brockhoff, Stochastic factors affecting the diffusion of a technological innovation, Journal of System Science and System Engineering, 3(3), 1994, pp. 241–256.

2. G. Hamel & C.K. Prahalad, Competing for the Future (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1994).

3. IMD announces ‘The World Competitiveness Yearbook 2000’ results (http;//www.imd.ch).

4. J. Z. Li, The reason and organization of R&D cooperation', Science Research Management, 21(1), 2000, pp. 106–112 (in Chinese).

5. B. Y. Godin & Y. Gingrasr, The place of universities in the system of knowledge production, Research Policy, 29, 2000, pp. 273–278.

6. K. Brockhoff & J. Guan, Innovation via new ventures as a conversion strategy for the Chinese defense industry, R&D Management, 26(1), 1996, pp. 49–56.

7. J. Guan & B. Gao, The major factors to terminate an ongoing R&D/innovation project for Chinese enterprises based on the empirical study, in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Management of Technology (International Academic Publishers, 1998), pp. 482–487.

8. J. Guan, Comparison study of industrial innovation between China and some European countries, Production and Inventory Management Journal, 43(3/4), 2002, pp. 30–46.

9. H. Etzkowitz & L. Leydesdorff, The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘mode 2’ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations, Research Policy, 29, 2000, pp. 109–123; J. Wen & S. Kobayashi, Exploring collaborative R&D network: some new evidence in Japan, Research Policy, 30, 2001, pp. 1309–1319.

10. K. Fujisue, Promotion of academia–industry cooperation in Japan: establishing the law of promoting technology transfer from university to industry in Japan, Technovation, 18(6/7), 1998, pp. 371–381; E. G. Carayannis, E. M. Rogers, K. Kurihara & M. M. Allbritton, High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities, Technovation, 18(1), 1998, pp. 1–11; E.G. Carayannis, J. Alexander & A. Ioannidis, Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming strategic government–university–industry (GUI) R&D partnerships in the US, Germany, and France, Technovation, 20, 2000, pp. 477–488; T. Gonard, The process of change in relationships between public research and industry: two case studies from France, R&D Management, 29(1), 1999, pp. 143–152; D. Jones-Evans, M. Klofsten, E. Anderson & D. Pandya, Creating a bridge between university and industry in small European countries: the role of the Industrial Liaison Office, R&D Management, 29(1), 1999, pp. 47–56; Gritsai, State university and Russian Academy of Sciences as contributors to the innovative restructuring of Moscow, GeoJournal, 41(4), 1997, pp. 379–386.

11. Fujisue, op. cit., Ref. 10.

12. J. Rees, ‘State technology programs and industry experience in the United States’, Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 3, 1991, pp. 39–59.

13. Li, op. cit., Ref. 4; Q. Lu & W. Lazonick, ‘The organization of innovation in a transitional economy’, Research Policy, 30, 2001, pp. 55–77.

14. Research Group of Chinese S&T Development Strategy, The Report of Regional Innovation Capabilities of China in 2001 (Beijing, The Press of Central University, 2002).

15. Research Group of Chinese S&T Development, Chinese S&T Development Research Report (Beijing, The Social Science Literature Press, 2000 and 2001).

16. Research Group of Chinese S&T Development Strategy, op. cit., Ref. 14.

17. Guan, op. cit., Ref. 8.

18. R. Coombs, P. Narandren & A. Richards, A literature-based iinnovation output indicator, Research Policy, 25, 1996, pp. 403–413.

19. OECD/Eurostat, Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data—OSLO Manual, rev. version (Paris, OECD, 1997).

20. Ibid.

21. Ibid.; E. Von Hippel. The Sources of Innovation (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997).

22. X. Liu & S. White, Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China's transitional context, Research Policy, 30, 2001, pp. 1091–1114.

23. F. Bougrain & B. Haudeville, Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities, Research Policy, 31, 2002, pp. 735–747.

24. Guan, op. cit., Ref. 8.

25. Brockhoff & Guan, op. cit., Ref. 6.

26. Ibid.

27. E. J. Kleinschmidt & R. J. Cooper, The impact of product innovativeness on performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(4), 1991, pp. 240–251; E. M. Olson, O. C. J. Walker & R. W. Ruekert, Organizing for effective new product development: the moderating role of product innovativeness, Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 1994, pp. 48–62.

28. X. M. Song & M. M. Montoya-Weiss, Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), 1998, pp. 124–135.

29. Ibid.

30. OECD/Eurostat, op. cit., Ref. 19.

31. A. G. Robinson & S. Stern, Innovation Explosion (New York, 1997).

32. OECD/Eurostat, op. cit., Ref. 19.

33. Y. L. Doz, The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliance: initial condition or learning process?, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 1996, pp. 55–83.

34. J. Guan & N. Ma, Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms, Technovation, 23(9), 2003, pp. 737–747.

35. Guan, op. cit., Ref. 8.

36. Brockhoff & Guan, op. cit., Ref. 6.

37. Ibid.

38. Song & Montoya-Weiss, op. cit., Ref. 28.