The Development and Diffusion of Radical Technological Innovation: The Role of Bus Demonstration Projects in Commercializing Fuel Cell Technology

Abstract

North American, European and Japanese governments have legislated to control Greenhouse Gas emissions and have promoted alternative technology as part of strategies to address climate change. Governments worldwide have sought to encourage adoption of alternative automotive technology by funding demonstrations and in-service trials. Among other initiatives the automotive industry has explored applications of a radical technological innovation—fuel cells—to power a range of vehicles from forklifts to buses. This paper examines the rationale and actions of various stakeholders to facilitate adoption of fuel cell technology in vehicles through a specific market segment—that of fuel cell buses (FCBs)—and explores the progress of FCB projects in North America, Europe and Japan. It examines the role of demonstration projects and highlights the complexity of the relationship between government and developers, and the multifarious and conflicting objectives of industry players that inhibit progress.

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the UK Economic and Social Research Council under the Sustainable Technologies (STP) programme, award number RES-332-25-0003.

Notes

1. J. Tidd & K. Bodley, The influence of project novelty on the new product development process, R&D Management, 32(2), 2002, pp. 127–138.

2. F.W. Geels, Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study, Research Policy, 31, 2002, pp. 1257–1274; J. Utterback, Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1994); S. G. Winter, Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 5, 1984, pp. 287–320; R. Nelson & S. Winter, In search of useful theory of innovation, Research Policy, 6, 1977, pp. 36–76.

3. J. Mohr, Marketing of High Technology Products and Innovations (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001).

4. R. Sutton & T. Kelley, Creativity doesn't require isolation: why product designers bring visitors ‘backstage’, California Management Review, 40(1), 1997, pp. 79–91.

5. G. S. Lynn, J. G. Morone & A. S. Paulson, Marketing and discontinuous innovation: the probe and learn process, California Management Review, 38(3), 1996, pp. 8–37.

6. S. Garfinkel, Proof of concept (the Net effect), Technology Review, May 2003.

7. E. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovation (London: The Free Press, 1983); G. Zaltman, R. Duncan & J. Holbek, Innovations and Organization (New York: John Wiley, 1973).

8. T. P. Hughes, Networks of Power: Electrification in Western society, 1880–1930 (Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1983).

9. P. Attewell, Technology diffusion and organisational learning: the case of business computing, Organization Science, 3(1), 1992, pp. 1–19

10. A. Afuah, Innovation Management (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).

11. J. Howells, The response of old technology incumbents to technological competition—does the sailing ship effect exist? Journal of Management Studies, 39(7), 2002, pp. 887–906.

12. R. Kemp, J. Schot & R. Hoogma, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 1998, pp. 175–195.

13. R. Kemp, J. Schot & R. Hoogma, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 1998, pp. 175–195.

14. S. Jacobsson & A. Bergek, Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(5), 2004, 815–849.

15. R. W. Rycroft & D. E. Kash, Path dependence in the innovation of complex technology, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 14(1), 2002, pp. 21–35.

16. Jacobsson & Bergek, op. cit., Ref. 13.

17. Utterback, op. cit., Ref. 1; Jacobsson & Bergek, op. cit., Ref. 13.

18. L. K. Mytelka, New wave technologies: their emergence, diffusion and impact. The case of hydrogen fuel cell technology and the developing world, United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies, Discussion Paper 3, 2003.

19. V. Chiesa & G. Toletti, Network of collaborations for innovation: the case of biotechnology, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 16(1), 2004, pp. 73–96.

20. Kemp et al., op. cit., Ref. 12.

21. K. M. Weber, Transforming large socio-technical systems towards sustainability: on the role of users and future visions for the uptake of city logistics and combined heat and power generation, Innovation, 16(2), 2003, pp. 155–175.

22. B. Elzen, R. Hoogma & R. Kemp, Managing the transition to sustainable transport—the approach of strategic niche management, in: D. Sperling & Ken Kurani (Eds), Transportation, Energy, and Environmental Policy, Proceedings of the VIII Biennial Asilomar Conference (Washington, DC: Transportation Board of the National Academies, 2003).

23. Jacobsson & Bergek, op. cit., Ref. 13.

24. M. Karlstrom & B. A. Andersson, Selecting and assessing demonstration projects: the case of fuel cells and hydrogen systems, ASEAT03, Manchester.

25. Ibid.

26. Ibid.

27. V. Norberg-Bohm, Creating incentives for environmentally enhancing technological change: lessons from 30 years of US energy technology policy, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65(2), 2000, pp. 125–148.

28. G. Moore, Crossing the Chasm (Oxford: Capstone Publishing, 1999).

29. Norberg-Bohm, op. cit., Ref. 26.

30. Ibid.

31. Ibid.

32. S. Jacobsson, B. A. Sanden & L. Bangens, Transforming the energy system—the evolution of the German technological systems for solar cells, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 16(1), 2004, pp. 3–30.

33. Howells, op. cit., Ref. 10; Elzen, op. cit., Ref. 22.

34. Geels, op. cit., Ref. 1; Kemp et al., op. cit., Ref. 12; J. Van den Ende & R. Kemp, Technological transformations in history: how the computer regime grew out of existing computing regimes, Research Policy, 28(8), 1999, pp. 833–851.

35. Rycroft et al., op. cit., Ref. 14.

36. P. J. Vergragt & R. van den Hoed, Technological shifts and industry reaction. A paper for Knowledge and Economic and Social Change: New Challenges to Innovation Studies, Conference Manchester, UK, 7–9 April 2003.

37. J. Heywood, Worshipful Company of Instrument Makers Lecture, May 2004.

38. M. T. Schneider, B. Schade & H. Grupp, Innovation process ‘fuel cell vehicle’ what strategy promises to be the most successful? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 16(2), 2004, pp. 147–172.

39. L. Fulton, Sustainable Transport—New Insights from the IEA's Worldwide Transit Study, IEA, 2001, available at www.iea.org/publications (accessed 25 January 2007).

40. Ballard Power Systems promotional literature, 2005.

41. Georgetown, Washington project website: http://fuelcellbus.georgetown.edu (accessed 25 January 2007).

42. FuelCellToday, Fuel Cell Market Survey: Buses, 1 December 2004 at: http://www.fuelcelltoday.com (accessed 25 January 2007).

43. Fuel Cell Bus Club website: 2nd International Fuel Cell Bus Workshop at http://www.fuel-cell-bus-club.com (accessed 25 January 2007).

44. ISE Corp corporate website: http://isecorp.com/hybrid_information_center/hybrid_benefit/economic-benefits.php (accessed 25 January 2007).

45. Fuel Cell Bus Club website, op. cit., Ref. 42.

46. E. Sunnerstadt, CUTE Stockholm Overview, Presentation at the CUTE Conference, Stockholm, September 2005, available at www.fuel-cell-bus-club.com/news (accessed 25 January 2007).

47. Fuel Cell Bus Club website, op. cit., Ref. 42.

48. Jacobsson & Bergek, op. cit., Ref. 13.

49. Fuel Cell Bus Club website, op. cit., Ref. 42.

50. European Automobile Manufacturers Association website at www.acea.be/files/GlobalMeeting Detroit.pdf (accessed 25 January 2007).

51. General Motors corporate website at http://www.gm.com/company/gmability/public_policy/environment/zev_mandate.htm (accessed 1 June 2005).

52. Karlstrom & Andersson, op. cit., Ref. 23.

53. Norberg-Bohm, op. cit., Ref. 26.

54. T. Koppel, Powering the Future (Toronto: John Wiley, 1999).

55. Fuel Cell Bus Club website, op. cit., Ref. 42.

56. Ballard Power, op. cit., Ref. 39.

57. C. Rips, Prepared Witness Testimony to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, 2003.

58. Fuel Cell Bus Club website, op. cit., Ref. 42.

59. Ibid.

60. Kemp et al., op. cit., Ref. 12.

61. Fuel Cell Bus Club website, op. cit., Ref. 42.

62. Kemp et al., op. cit., Ref. 12.

63. Karlstrom & Andersson, op. cit., Ref. 23.

64. Jacobsson & Bergek, op. cit., Ref. 13; Karlstrom & Andersson, op. cit., Ref. 23.

65. Weber, op. cit., Ref. 20.

66. P. Muldur, C. H. Reschke & R. Kemp, Evolutionary theorising on technological change and sustainable development, Paper prepared for the European Meeting on Applied Evolutionary Economics, 7–9 June 1999, Grenoble, France.

67. Moore, op. cit., Ref. 27.

68. Ibid.

69. M. Raynor & H. Weinberg, Beyond segmentation, Harvard Business Review, November–December 2004, pp. 22–28.

70. Ibid.

71. Jacobsson & Bergek, op. cit., Ref. 13.

72. Chiesa & Toletti, op. cit., Ref. 18.

73. Jacobsson & Bergek, op. cit., Ref. 13.

74. Ibid.

75. F. Berkhout, A. Smith & A. Stirling, Socio-technological regimes and transition context, ESRC Sustainable Technologies Programme Working Paper 2003/3.

76. Karlstrom & Andersson, op. cit., Ref. 23.

77. Norberg-Bohm, op. cit., Ref. 26.

78. Kemp et al., op. cit., Ref. 12.

79. Norberg-Bohm, op. cit., Ref. 26.

80. Raynor & Weinberg, op. cit., Ref. 68.

81. Elzen et al., op. cit., Ref. 21.

82. Berkhout et al., op. cit., Ref. 74.

83. Elzen et al., op. cit., Ref. 21.