Abstract
The Shaw–McKinnon framework, the foundation of mainstream thinking on the role of financial markets and institutions in economic development and the basis for policy-making in many LDCs for the last 18 years, is shown to be flawed when viewed in a post-Keynesian perspective. Three interrelated aspects of post-Keynesian theory are used to challenge the financial liberalization models and to posit an alternative post-Keynesian perspective on the role of financial institutions and markets in economic development. These aspects are: (1) the finance-investment-saving-funding circuit; (2) the financial fragility hypothesis; and (3) the evolution of institutions and conventions in an uncertain world.
∗This article is the 1992 winner of the Alfred Eichner Scholarship.
∗This article is the 1992 winner of the Alfred Eichner Scholarship.
Notes
∗This article is the 1992 winner of the Alfred Eichner Scholarship.