Abstract
The findings of the six independent studies on institutional forms of HIV discrimination in the Asia Pacific presented in this Special Issue of AIDS Care are integrated. At first glance, the general pattern of the results across the study sites suggests that discrimination is most pertinent in the domain of ‘practice’ rather than in the domains of law or institutional policy. On closer analysis, however, utilising the qualitative data, this conclusion does not take sufficient account of the cultural context within which the interpersonal interaction (practice) between the health carers and people living with HIV/AIDS occurs. Limitations on the use of anti-discrimination legislations and protective written policies for reducing discrimination in these contexts are discussed. The need for alternative approaches to thinking about discrimination intervention is raised and this is done through a consideration of the strategy of universal precautions.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the Ford Foundation to Deakin University (Grant No. 1010-1173). Daniel Reidpath was supported by a Senior Research Fellowship from the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation. Many people have contributed to the work. In particular, we would like to thank: Bianca Brijnath, Monica Barratt, Lisa Messersmith, Eve Lee, our collaborators, and those who supported them. Dr Joe Thomas was a principal investigator of the project from May 2001 to March 2003.