Publication Cover
AIDS Care
Psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV
Volume 29, 2017 - Issue 1
1,188
Views
45
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Are religion and spirituality barriers or facilitators to treatment for HIV: a systematic review of the literature

Pages 1-13 | Received 29 Jan 2016, Accepted 08 Jun 2016, Published online: 13 Jul 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Much attention has been given to the relationship between religion/spirituality (R/S) and HIV in recent years, but comparatively little has been explored in regard to R/S and HIV testing, retention in care, and adherence to medication. Religious views concerning HIV risk behavior pose challenges to communication and education about sexual health in religious communities and may serve as barriers to HIV treatment and care. Conversely, religious coping and spiritual well-being, as well as social support could serve as facilitators to HIV treatment and care. This study aims to fill a gap in the literature by addressing the following questions: (1) what dimensions of R/S have been found to be factors associated with HIV outcomes?; (2) which R/S factors function as barriers or facilitators to care among people living with HIV (PLWH)?; and (3) which R/S factors, if any, vary across socio-demographic groups? Thirty-three empirical articles were identified for systematic review. Of the 33 empirical studies included, 24 studies found that at least one measure of R/S was associated with better adherence and clinical health outcomes. Twelve studies found at least one measure of R/S to be associated with poorer adherence and clinical health outcomes. Seven of the studies found at least one R/S measure to have no significant association with outcomes. Though all of the studies included in this review focused on R/S experiences of PLWH, there was very little consistency in regard to measurement of R/S. Studies in this review included a wide range of R/S measures, including beliefs, religious/spiritual practices, R/S coping, organizational religion, and many more. Of the 33 studies reviewed, only 9 focused on unique populations such as women, people with histories of substance abuse, immigrants, etc. Findings from this review highlight opportunities for more studies in various populations using standardized R/S measures.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality under T-32 [grant number 5T32HS013852].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 464.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.