Male circumcision for HIV prevention: female risk compensatory behaviour in South Africa

ABSTRACT

South Africa promotes male circumcision (MC) as an HIV prevention method and implemented a national plan to scale-up MC in the country from 2012 to 2016. Literature has suggested that female risk compensatory behaviours (RCBs) are occurring in countries where these programmes have been implemented. Behaviours such as decreased condom use, concurrent sexual partners and sexual activity during the circumcision wound-healing period have the potential to jeopardise the campaigns’ objectives. Literature has shown that directly providing women with MC information results in correct knowledge however, previous studies have not directly sought women’s views and ideas on engagement with the information. This study aims to identify and explore female RCBs in relation to MC campaigns in South Africa, and to identify interventions that would result in greater female involvement in the campaigns. Snowball sampling was used to conduct twelve qualitative vignette-facilitated semi-structured interviews with women residing in a municipal housing estate in Durban, Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa. Interviews were audio-recorded, verbatim transcribed and analysed using framework analysis. MC knowledge and understanding varied, with some participants mistaking MC as direct HIV protection for females. Despite a lack in knowledge, the majority of women did not report signs of RCBs. Even with a lack of evidence of RCBs, misinterpretation of the MC protective effect has the potential to lead to RCBs; a concept acknowledged in the literature. Several women expressed that MC campaigns are directed to males only and expressed a keenness to be more involved. Suggested interventions include couple counselling and female information sessions in community clinics. Exploring women’s attitude towards involvement in MC campaigns fills in a research knowledge gap that is important to international health, as women have a vital role to play in reducing the transmission of HIV.

KEYWORDS:

• Male circumcision
• HIV
• risk compensatory behaviour
• knowledge
• intervention

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all of those who participated in the interviews and the organisation, Senzokuhle, for helping to access and organise participants.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

ORCID

Firoza Haffejee http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-8949

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported in part by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa, Unique grant number 99315.