Abstract
The public's understanding of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) related issues and their likely actions following a CBRN incident is an issue of great concern, as public psychological and behavioural responses will help determine subsequent morbidity and mortality rates. This paper explores the role of effective government communication with the public and its role in mediating the social and psychological impact of terrorist attacks. We examine the importance of effective communication in reducing morbidity and mortality in the event of a terrorist attack and explore the impact of risk perceptions in determining the success or failure of risk communication strategies. This includes the examination of the role of fear as a health risk, and the identification of factors relevant to public trust in risk communication. Finally, an investigation of the type of information desired by members of the public leads the authors to make risk communication recommendations targeted at the promotion of more adaptive behaviours in response to CBRN attacks
Notes
Notes
[2] See for example: Eiser, [Citation2004]; Alhakami and Slovic, [Citation1993]; Löfstedt, Citation[2005]; Siegrist, Keller, and Kiers, [Citation2005]; Slovic, [Citation1987]; [Citation1991]; Slovic, Finucane, Peters, and MacGregor, [Citation2004]; Slovic, Fischhoff, and Lichtenstein, [Citation1981], Citation[1980], Citation[1986]; Tanaka, [Citation1998]; etc.
[3] See Trumbo and Shanahan, [Citation2000]; Löfstedt, Citation[2003]; Pidgeon, Kasperson, and Slovic, [Citation2003]; Kasperson and Kasperson, [Citation2005]; Kasperson, Kasperson, Pidgeon, and Slovic, [Citation2005] for a full description of the social amplification of risk framework.
Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Rating the risks. Environment 1979; 21(4)14–20, 36–39 Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. Societal risk assessment: How safe is safe enough, RC Schwing, W. A. Albers, Jr. Plenum, New York 1980 Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Perceived risk: Psychological factors and social implications. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 1981; A376: 17–34 Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Characterizing perceived risk. Perilous progress: Managing the hazards of technology, RW Kates, C. Hohenemser, J. Kasperson. Westview, Boulder, CO 1985; 91–125 Bouder F, Rogers MB, Krieger K, Löfstedt R. L. Understanding and communicating the risks of nuclear waste. The future of nuclear power in Europe: The role of public perceptions and risk communication, MB Rogers, K Krieger, F Bouder, RL Lofstedt, 2006, Unpublished report Eiser JR. Public perception of risk. Report prepared for Foresight Office of Science and Technology (July, 2004). 2004 Alhakami AS, Slovic P. A psychological atudy of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Decision Research Report. 1993; 93–97 Lofstedt R, Frewer L. Risk & modern society. Earthscan, London 1998 Siegrist M, Keller C, Kiers HAL. A new look at the psychometric paradigm of perception of hazards. Risk Analysis 2005; 25(1)211–223 Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science 1987; 236: 280–285 Slovic P. Beyond numbers: A broader perspective on risk perception and risk communication. Acceptable evidence, DG. Mayo, RD Hollander. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1991 Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk and rationality. Risk Analysis 2004; 24(2)311–322 Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Perceived risk: Psychological factors and social implications. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 1981; A376: 17–34 Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. The psychometric study of risk perception. Risk evaluation and management, Vincent T. Covello, Joshua Menkos, Jeryl Mumpower. Pienum Publishing Corporation, New York 1986 Ursano RJ, Fullteron CS, Norwood A. E. Terrorism and disaster: Individual and community mental health interventions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeUK 2003; 1–21 Tanaka Y. Psychological dimensions of risk assessment: Risk perception and risk communication. Progress in Nuclear Energy 1998; 32(3/4)243–253 Trumbo CW, Shanahan J. Social research on climate change: Where have we been, where we are, and where we might go. Public Understanding of Science 2000; 9: 199–204 Lowe T, Brown K, Dessai S, Doria MF, Haynes K, Vincent K. Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science 2006; 15: 435–457 Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P. The social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeUK 2003 Kasperson RE, Palmlund I. Evaluating Risk Communication. The social contours of risk. Volume 1: Publics, risk communication and the social amplification of risk, JX Kasperson, RE Kasperson. Earthscan, London 2005; 51–67 Kasperson RE, Palmlund I. Evaluating Risk Communication. The social contours of risk. Volume 1: Publics, risk communication and the social amplification of risk, JX Kasperson, RE Kasperson. Earthscan, London 2005; 51–67