Comparing the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) and Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation (MATE)

Abstract

Substance use disorder (SUD) assessment and measurement in Brazil, as well as in many other countries, face significant shortcomings. The Measurement in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation (MATE) was developed as a public domain tool, drawing from validated scales and incorporating World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. The Brazilian version of the MATE (MATE-pt-BR) was evaluated for its reliability and validity, with a total of 239 subjects participating in the study, and data collected between 11/01/2021 and 09/01/2022. The majority were male (79.2%), with diverse racial backgrounds. The substances most prevalently used in the last 30 days were. Alcohol (73.2%), nicotine (63.6%), and cocaine (44.2%). The mean scores for MATE modules showed variations, with Module Q2 assessing psychological well-being having high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92). MATE-pt-BR demonstrated robust internal consistency, with Module 6 (personality) and Module 2 (medical and psychiatric consultation indicators) being exceptions. MATE-pt-BR exhibited significant correlations among its sections and strong discriminant validity. Moreover, the paper compares MATE-pt-BR with the Addiction Severity Index (ASI-6), which is considered the gold-standard measure for SUD assessments. MATE-pt-BR offers a valuable tool for assessing substance use and related functional impairments in the Brazilian context.

Keywords:

• Substance use disorder assessment
• measurement in the addictions for triage and evaluation (MATE)
• validity
• reliability
• world health organization international classification of functioning
• disability
• and health (ICF)
• addiction severity index (ASI-6)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Prof. Gerard Schippers and Dr. Theo Broekman for their unconditional support for developing MATE-pt-BR.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).