385
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Analysis of systematic engineering design paradigms in industrial practice: A survey

Pages 427-445 | Received 20 Nov 2008, Accepted 25 Oct 2009, Published online: 19 Feb 2010
 

Abstract

The engineering design process is analysed and different contributing paradigms are identified, including the abstraction-to-detail paradigm mostly associated with systematic design. This analysis is supported by a questionnaire-based survey of design engineers to evaluate the industry's perception and use of systematic design paradigms. The insight gained by these results helps build an understanding of the observed discrepancy between the formal systematic design theory and many current design practices in the industry.

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to extend his gratitude to the colleagues who supported the survey, either by offering insights and opinions during the initial consultations or by responding to the questionnaire.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 438.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.