Abstract
The engineering design process is analysed and different contributing paradigms are identified, including the abstraction-to-detail paradigm mostly associated with systematic design. This analysis is supported by a questionnaire-based survey of design engineers to evaluate the industry's perception and use of systematic design paradigms. The insight gained by these results helps build an understanding of the observed discrepancy between the formal systematic design theory and many current design practices in the industry.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to extend his gratitude to the colleagues who supported the survey, either by offering insights and opinions during the initial consultations or by responding to the questionnaire.