718
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Research on the correlation mechanism between eye-tracking data and aesthetic ratings in product aesthetic evaluation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 55-80 | Received 08 Aug 2022, Accepted 22 Jan 2023, Published online: 05 Feb 2023
 

Abstract

It is an open question whether the results of human evaluations of product aesthetics can be reasonably predicted from eye-tracking data. In this paper, we investigate the correlation mechanism between eye-tracking data and product aesthetic ratings so that the eye-tracking data can form a scientific reference in product aesthetic evaluation to better guide product design. It is proven that the four chosen eye-tracking indices, including total fixation duration, fixation count, visit count and total visit duration, are significantly correlated with product aesthetic ratings, and it is possible to achieve objective quantification of product aesthetics. The correlation between eye-tracking data and product aesthetic ratings is analysed, and an evaluation model of the product aesthetic correlation mechanism is proposed based on eye-tracking data. Experimental results demonstrate that product aesthetic evaluation is not mysterious or unique and can be reasonably described through data analysis and mathematical algorithms. If the correlation mechanism between eye-tracking data and product aesthetics is well established, the scientific evaluation of product aesthetics can be easily achieved.

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Shandong University for providing us with an excellent experimental platform and to all the subjects who participated in the experiments of this study. In addition, we would like to thank the editors, reviewers, and publication staff for their efforts on this article.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the author [Yong Wang], upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the [Shandong University Pedagogy Reform Research Project] under Grant [number 2020Y218].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 438.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.