579
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pigmentation

Efficacy of cysteamine cream in the treatment of epidermal melasma, evaluating by Dermacatch as a new measurement method: a randomized double blind placebo controlled study

, &
Pages 182-189 | Received 21 Mar 2017, Accepted 05 Jun 2017, Published online: 26 Jul 2017
 

Abstract

Background: Melasma is a difficult-to-treat hyperpigmentary disorder. Very few studies have been performed regarding the efficacy of cysteamine in the treatment of melasma.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of cysteamine cream in the treatment of patients with epidermal melasma using Dermacatch® as a more accurate skin colorimetric measurement tool.

Methods: Participating patients (n = 40) received either placebo (n = 20) or cysteamine cream (n = 20) in a double-blind placebo controlled study. Cysteamine cream or placebo was applied on the lesions once a day at bedtime throughout the four-month study period. Treatment efficacy was determined through Dermacatch® and Mexameter® skin colorimetry, MASI scores, Investigator Global Assessments (IGAs), and patient questionnaires, all performed at baseline, 2-month, and 4-month examinations.

Results: Prior to the start of the protocol, the mean difference between pigmented and normal skin was calculated for cysteamine and placebo groups using both Dermacatch® (72.3 ± 27.8 and 52.9 ± 16.4, respectively) and Mexameter® (93.6 ± 42.6 and 65.4 ± 22.6, respectively). At 2 months, the mean differences were 38.1 ± 15.3 (Dermacatch®) and 49.9 ± 19 (Mexameter®) in the cysteamine group and 64.9 ± 25.3 (Dermacatch®) and 68 ± 26.2 (Mexameter®) in the placebo group. At 4 months, the mean differences were 23.8 ± 12.9 (Dermacatch®) and 35.5 ± 16.1 (Mexameter®) in the cysteamine group, and 50 ± 18 (Dermacatch®) and 51.2 ± 16.8 (Mexameter®) in the placebo group. Statistically significant differences were found between the cysteamine and placebo group outcomes at both time points (p = .01, p = .02). At the end of the treatment period, MASI scores were significantly lower in the cysteamine group versus placebo (8.03 ± 5.2 vs. 12.2 ± 7.4, p = .04). IGA scores and patient viewpoints indicated significant efficacy of cysteamine cream versus placebo.

Conclusion: Cysteamine cream showed significant efficacy in decreasing melanin content of the lesions, as established by Dermacatch® as a new measuring method.

View correction statement:
Correction

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the derma lab personnel of “Skin and Stem Cell Research Center” for their cooperation in this study.

Disclosure statement

Dr Behrooz Kasraee works at Scientis Pharma SA, but he did not have a role in data collection and analysis.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.