Mycophenolate mofetil and lichen planopilaris: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

For severe cases of lichen planopilaris (LPP), unresponsive to first line therapy, systemic or potent agents may be required for disease control. There have been several reports of the off-label use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients with LPP or have developed adverse effects to initial agents.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to recommended Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies with ≥5 cases reporting the outcomes of MMF in LPP were pooled and a meta-analysis of proportion was performed. Case reports were excluded from analysis.

Results

A total of six studies were identified and included for meta-analysis, comprising 94 LPP patients. The pooled proportion of any good response (partial or complete) was 69.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 47.8–77). The pooled proportion of complete response was 20% (95% CI: 10.1–36.3). The pooled proportion of partial responses was 49.2% (95% CI: 30.5–63.7). Side effects occurred in 16.9% (95% CI: 17.6–33.2). of cases, which included elevated LFTs, edema, hyperlipidemia, anemia, herpes zoster infection, photosensitivity, and urinary tract infection.

Conclusion

The current evidence for MMF remains limited. However, it appears to be a potential treatment option for patients with severe or recalcitrant LPP who have failed hydroxychloroquine and other immunosuppressants.

Keywords:

• Mycophenolate mofetil
• lichen planopilaris
• immunosuppression
• cyclosporine
• hydroxychloroquinone

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).