Abstract
Purpose: To determine the dependence of celecoxib on the tumour micro-environment in vitro and in vivo and to compare the use of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and 18F- 3′-deoxy-3-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) to measure tumour response.
Materials and methods: In vitro, colony assays were performed on a cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX-2) negative (HCT116) and a COX-2 positive cell line (HCA7). Xenograft models of these cell lines were treated with celecoxib and/or radiotherapy. Micro Positron Emission Tomography (microPET) scans with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT were performed at different time-points.
Results: In vitro, no radiosensitising effect was seen in either of the cell lines. In vivo results showed a significant effect of celecoxib in the COX-2 negative tumours (HCT116) (enhancement ratio 1.5, p = 0.02) while no significant effect was observed in the COX-2 positive model (HCA7). A good correlation between 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT uptake was seen in both tumour models (r = 0.48, p = 0.002; r = 0.41, p = 0.005). After irradiation, a decrease in the uptake of both tracers was observed in both tumour models, which was more pronounced in the combination group, confirming the growth delay data.
Conclusions: The contradicting in vitro and in vivo results suggest a major role of the tumour micro-environment. 18F-FLT seems a good alternative for 18F-FDG to follow tumour growth after radiation treatment.